Literature DB >> 25117502

Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice.

Christina G Selkirk1, Kristen J Vogel, Anna C Newlin, Scott M Weissman, Shelly M Weiss, Chi-Hsiung Wang, Peter J Hulick.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing genetic testing panels for cancer susceptibility (cancer panels) have recently become clinically available. At present, clinical utility is unknown and there are no set criteria or guidelines established for whom to offer such testing. Although it may be a cost-effective method to test multiple cancer susceptibility genes concurrently, the rate of finding variants of unknown significance (VUS) may be high and testing may yield mutations in genes with no established management recommendations. We describe our Center's experience over a 14-month period (April 2012-June 2013) for patient interest and uptake in cancer panel testing and whether there were predictors of pursuing testing or identifying mutations. Using a clinical ranking system, patients' family histories were ranked from 0 to 3 (low likelihood to high likelihood for underlying genetic susceptibility). The clinical ranking system was assessed to determine its predictability of finding mutations. Of the 689 patients who met inclusion criteria, the option of pursuing a cancer panel was discussed with 357 patients; 63 (17.6 %) patients pursued testing. Those who pursued testing were more likely to be older, male, affected with cancer, affected with multiple primary cancers, and had a higher clinical rank than non-pursuers. There were no significant predictors of finding a mutation on panel testing. Of the 61 patients who have received results, there was a 6.6 % mutation rate and 19.7 % VUS rate. The yield of cancer panels in clinical practice is low and the strength of family history alone may not predict likelihood of finding a mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117502     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9741-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  25 in total

1.  Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  MutYH mutation carriers have increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Gad Rennert; Flavio Lejbkowicz; Ilana Cohen; Mila Pinchev; Hedy S Rennert; Ofra Barnett-Griness
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Heather Fecteau; Kristen J Vogel; Kristen Hanson; Shannon Morrill-Cornelius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net?

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Angela Bradbury; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing.

Authors:  Nicholas J Roberts; Joshua T Vogelstein; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Disease-targeted sequencing: a cornerstone in the clinic.

Authors:  Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Molecular genetics of breast and ovarian cancer: recent advances and clinical implications.

Authors:  N Bogdanova; T Dörk
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.519

10.  MUTYH gene variants and breast cancer in a Dutch case–control study.

Authors:  Astrid A Out; Marijke Wasielewski; Petra E A Huijts; Ivonne J H M van Minderhout; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Carli M J Tops; Maartje Nielsen; Caroline Seynaeve; Juul T Wijnen; Martijn H Breuning; Christi J van Asperen; Mieke Schutte; Frederik J Hes; Peter Devilee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  16 in total

1.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.

Authors:  Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program.

Authors:  David J Hermel; Wendy C McKinnon; Marie E Wood; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dennis M Deapen; Paul Abrahamse; Irina Bondarenko; Yun Li; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Evaluation of laboratory perspectives on hereditary cancer panels.

Authors:  Jessica Stoll; Scott M Weissman; Nicole Hook; Christina Selkirk; Amy Knight Johnson; Anna Newlin; Kristen J Vogel Postula
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing in an Era of Rapid Change.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Keelia Rhoads Clemens; John Quillin; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Pia Summerour; Rebecca Nagy; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  The Changing Landscape of Genetic Testing for Inherited Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

8.  Technological advances in precision medicine and drug development.

Authors:  Elaine Maggi; Nicole E Patterson; Cristina Montagna
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-05-05

9.  Next-Generation Testing for Cancer Risk: Perceptions, Experiences, and Needs Among Early Adopters in Community Healthcare Settings.

Authors:  Kathleen R Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Ilana Solomon; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Julie O Culver; Gwen C Uman; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Beth Crawford; Sophie B Adams; Taylor Sittler; Jeroen van den Akker; Salina Chan; Ofri Leitner; Lauren Ryan; Elad Gil; Laura van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.