Literature DB >> 29151150

A comparison of cancer risk assessment and testing outcomes in patients from underserved vs. tertiary care settings.

Huma Q Rana1,2, Sarah R Cochrane3, Elaine Hiller3, Ruth N Akindele3, Callie M Nibecker3, Ludmila A Svoboda3, Angel M Cronin3, Judy E Garber3,4, Christopher S Lathan3,4.   

Abstract

In cancer genetics, technological advances (next generation sequencing) and the expansion of genetic test options have resulted in lowered costs and increased access to genetic testing. Despite this, the majority of patients utilizing cancer genetics services lack diversity of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Through retrospective chart review, we compared outcomes of cancer genetics consultations at a tertiary cancer center and a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) (58 tertiary and 23 FQHC patients) from 2013 to 2015. The two groups differed in race, ethnicity, use of translator services, and type of insurance coverage. There were also significant differences in completeness of family history information, with more missing information about relatives in the FQHC group. In spite of these differences, genetic testing rates among those offered testing were comparable across the two groups with 74% of tertiary patients and 60% of FQHC patients completing testing. Implementation of community-based cancer genetics outreach clinics represents an opportunity to improve access to genetic counseling services, but more research is needed to develop effective counseling models for diverse patient populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Cancer genetics; Disparities; FQHC; Genetic counseling; Interpreter; Underserved

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151150      PMCID: PMC6002308          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0347-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  38 in total

1.  Health Care Segregation, Physician Recommendation, and Racial Disparities in BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Susan M Domchek; Peter W Groeneveld; Younji Kim; U Nkiru Motanya; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program.

Authors:  David J Hermel; Wendy C McKinnon; Marie E Wood; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Tiffany Edwards; Cristina Villagra; M Carina Rodriguez; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Randall W Burt; Jamie A Cannon; Donald S David; Dayna S Early; James M Ford; Francis M Giardiello; Amy L Halverson; Stanley R Hamilton; Heather Hampel; Mohammad K Ismail; Kory Jasperson; Jason B Klapman; Audrey J Lazenby; Patrick M Lynch; Robert J Mayer; Reid M Ness; Dawn Provenzale; M Sambasiva Rao; Moshe Shike; Gideon Steinbach; Jonathan P Terdiman; David Weinberg; Mary Dwyer; Deborah Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D Brewster; H Campbell; M E M Porteous; A H Wyllie; C C Bird; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Use of Cancer Genetics Services in African-American Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Tarsha Jones; Joan S Lockhart; Kari E Mendelsohn-Victor; Debra Duquette; Laurel L Northouse; Sonia A Duffy; Rosemary Donley; Sofia D Merajver; Kara J Milliron; J Scott Roberts; Maria C Katapodi
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 1.2014.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Carolyn Horton; Virginia Kaklamani; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary A Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Disparities in BRCA testing: when insurance coverage is not a barrier.

Authors:  Windy Olaya; Pamela Esquivel; Jan H Wong; John W Morgan; Adam Freeberg; Sharmila Roy-Chowdhury; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Performance of PREMM(1,2,6), MMRpredict, and MMRpro in detecting Lynch syndrome among endometrial cancer cases.

Authors:  Rowena C Mercado; Heather Hampel; Fay Kastrinos; Ewout Steyerberg; Judith Balmana; Elena Stoffel; David E Cohn; Floor J Backes; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Graham Casey; Robert Haile; Subha Madhavan; Albert de la Chapelle; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Laura-Kate Shaw; Karen Cavanagh; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Pilot study of a culturally sensitive intervention to promote genetic counseling for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Jessica M Madrigal; Le' Chaun Kendall; Pooja Parekh; Jennifer Newsome; Ifeanyi Beverly Chukwudozie; De Lawnia Comer-Hagans; Vickii Coffey; Giesela Grumbach; Shirley Spencer; Carolyn Rodgers; Ravneet Kaur; Lara Balay; Tara Maga; Zo Ramamonjiarivelo; Catherine Balthazar; Robert Winn; Karriem Watson; Angela Odoms-Young; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Nyahne Q Bergeron; Desmona C Strahan; Pamela S Ganschow; Aditya S Khanna; Karriem Watson; Kent Hoskins; Yamile Molina
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  A pilot randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase genetic counseling and genetic testing among Latina breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Eida M Castro-Figueroa; Laura Moreno; Julie Dutil; Jennifer D García; Carolina Burgos; Charité Ricker; Jongphil Kim; Kristi D Graves; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Hatem Soliman; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Increasing access to individualized medicine: a matched-cohort study examining Latino participant experiences of genomic screening.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Alex Lee; Jamie O Byrne; Idali Cuellar; Erica J Sutton; Valentina Hernandez; Noralane M Lindor; Davinder Singh; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.