Literature DB >> 27400645

Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.

Matthew J Watson1, Arvin K George1, Mahir Maruf1, Thomas P Frye1, Akhil Muthigi1, Michael Kongnyuy1, Subin G Valayil1, Peter A Pinto1.   

Abstract

Accurate risk stratification of prostate cancer is achieved with a number of existing tools to ensure the identification of at-risk patients, characterization of disease aggressiveness, prediction of cancer burden and extrapolation of treatment outcomes for appropriate management of the disease. Statistical tables and nomograms using classic clinicopathological variables have long been the standard of care. However, the introduction of multiparametric MRI, along with fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsy and novel biomarkers, are being assimilated into clinical practice. The majority of studies to date present the outcomes of each in isolation. The current review offers a critical and objective assessment regarding the integration of multiparametric MRI and fusion-guided prostate biopsy with novel biomarkers and predictive nomograms in contemporary clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; multiparametric MRI; nomograms; prostate; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400645      PMCID: PMC5066119          DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  123 in total

1.  Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Hedvig Hricak; Michael W Kattan; Lawrence H Schwartz; Steven C Eberhardt; Hui-Ni Chen; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results.

Authors:  James S Wysock; Neil Mendhiratta; Fabio Zattoni; Xiaosong Meng; Marc Bjurlin; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.

Authors:  Raju Chelluri; Amichai Kilchevsky; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Thomas P Frye; Daniel Su; Michele Fascelli; Richard Ho; Steven F Abboud; Baris Turkbey; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Reproducibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy: Multi-Institutional External Validation by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort.

Authors:  Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Steven F Abboud; Arvin K George; Thomas P Frye; Richard Ho; Raju Chelluri; Michele Fascelli; Joanna Shih; Robert Villani; Eran Ben-Levi; Oksana Yaskiv; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample.

Authors:  James B Yu; Danil V Makarov; Richa Sharma; Richard E Peschel; Alan W Partin; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Evaluation of prostate cancer antigen 3 for detecting prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Wenzhou Cao; Quan Li; Hua Shen; Chao Liu; Junpeng Deng; Jiangfeng Xu; Qiang Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction model for prostate biopsy risk stratification.

Authors:  Brian L Meyerson; Justin Streicher; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-07-23

4.  The Utility of Prostate Specific Antigen Density, Prostate Health Index, and Prostate Health Index Density in Predicting Positive Prostate Biopsy Outcome is Dependent on the Prostate Biopsy Methods.

Authors:  Camila Lopes Vendrami; Robert J McCarthy; Argha Chatterjee; David Casalino; Edward M Schaeffer; William J Catalona; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Identification of Tumor-Specific MRI Biomarkers Using Machine Learning (ML).

Authors:  Rima Hajjo; Dima A Sabbah; Sanaa K Bardaweel; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

6.  Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Janice N Thai; Harish A Narayanan; Arvin K George; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Parita Shah; Francesca V Mertan; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 29.146

7.  Multimodality Image Fusion with PSMA PET/CT and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Focal Therapy for Primary Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer: A Planned Research Initiative.

Authors:  Marcia C Javitt; Alexander Kravtsov; Zohar Keidar; Sobhi Abadi; Gilad E Amiel
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 8.  A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas C Cheung; Neil Fleshner; Shomik Sengupta; Dixon Woon
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.