Literature DB >> 20590543

Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.

Baris Turkbey1, Sheng Xu, Jochen Kruecker, Julia Locklin, Yuxi Pang, Marcelino Bernardo, Maria J Merino, Bradford J Wood, Peter L Choyke, Peter A Pinto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To develop a system that documents the location of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies by fusing them to MRI scans obtained prior to biopsy, as the actual location of prostate biopsies is rarely known. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients (median age 61) with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 5.8 ng/ml underwent 3T endorectal coil MRI prior to biopsy. 3D TRUS images were obtained just prior to standard TRUS-guided 12-core sextant biopsies wherein an electromagnetic positioning device was attached to the needle guide and TRUS probe in order to track the position of each needle pass. The 3D-TRUS image documenting the location of each biopsy was fused electronically to the T2-weighted MRI. Each biopsy needle track was marked on the TRUS images and these were then transposed onto the MRI. Each biopsy site was classified pathologically as positive or negative for cancer and the Gleason score was determined. RESULTS The location of all (n= 605) needle biopsy tracks was successfully documented on the T2-weighted (T2W) MRI. Among 50 patients, 20 had 56 positive cores. At the sites of biopsy, T2W signal was considered 'positive' for cancer (i.e. low in signal intensity) in 34 of 56 sites. CONCLUSION It is feasible to document the location of TRUS-guided prostate biopsies on pre-procedure MRI by fusing the pre-procedure TRUS to an endorectal coil MRI using electromagnetic needle tracking. This procedure may be useful in documenting the location of prior biopsies, improving quality control and thereby avoiding under-sampling of the prostate as well as directing subsequent biopsies to regions of the prostate not previously sampled.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20590543      PMCID: PMC3272674          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09483.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Derek Cool; Shi Sherebrin; Jonathan Izawa; Joseph Chin; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Bradford J Wood; Hui Zhang; Amir Durrani; Neil Glossop; Sohan Ranjan; David Lindisch; Eliott Levy; Filip Banovac; Joern Borgert; Sascha Krueger; Jochen Kruecker; Anand Viswanathan; Kevin Cleary
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Baris Turkbey; Neil Glossop; Anurag K Singh; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-09

4.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Mapping of transrectal ultrasonographic prostate biopsies: quality control and learning curve assessment by image processing.

Authors:  Pierre Mozer; Michael Baumann; Gregoire Chevreau; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Stephane Bart; Raphaele Renard-Penna; Eva Comperat; Pierre Conort; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Francois Richard; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Matthew Miessau; David G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Winston Barzell
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE).

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping biopsy.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Walter Taubenslag; Hugo Andreini; Sarah Brammer; Wayne M Butler; Edward Adamovich; Zachary Allen; Richard Anderson; Kent E Wallner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  [MRI navigated stereotactic prostate biopsy: fusion of MRI and real-time transrectal ultrasound images for perineal prostate biopsies].

Authors:  T H Kuru; C Tulea; T Simpfendörfer; V Popeneciu; M Roethke; B A Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The NIH Clinical Center and the future of clinical research.

Authors:  John I Gallin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Sunghwan Lim; Changhan Jun; Doyoung Chang; Doru Petrisor; Misop Han; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Re: Phantom study of a novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasonography fusion (from: Kuru TH, Roethke M, Popeneclu V, et al. J Endourol 2012;26:807-813.).

Authors:  Hayet Amalou; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Imaging and pathology findings after an initial negative MRI-US fusion-guided and 12-core extended sextant prostate biopsy session.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Anthony N Hoang; Barış Türkbey; Lambros Stamatakis; Sheng Xu; Hayet Amalou; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Jeffrey W Nix; Srinivas Vourganti; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 6.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.

Authors:  Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Simon; Vanessa Moreno; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Spatial Tracking of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Locations: Moving Towards Effective Focal Partial Prostate Gland Ablation with Improved Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Steven Sidelsky; Shaan Setia; Srinivas Vourganti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Robotic ultrasound and needle guidance for prostate cancer management: review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Dan Stoianovici; Misop Han
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Anna M Brown; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.