Literature DB >> 27395750

Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Kathryn A Martinez1, Ken Resnicow2, Geoffrey C Williams3, Marlene Silva4, Paul Abrahamse5, Dean A Shumway6, Lauren P Wallner7, Steven J Katz8, Sarah T Hawley9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Provider communication that supports patient autonomy has been associated with numerous positive patient outcomes. However, to date, no research has examined the relationship between perceived provider communication style and patient-assessed decision quality in breast cancer.
METHODS: Using a population-based sample of women with localized breast cancer, we assessed patient perceptions of autonomy-supportive communication from their surgeons and medical oncologists, as well as patient-reported decision quality. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between autonomy-supportive communication and subjective decision quality for surgery and chemotherapy decisions, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors, as well as patient-reported communication preference (non-directive or directive).
RESULTS: Among the 1690 women included in the overall sample, patient-reported decision quality scores were positively associated with higher levels of perceived autonomy-supportive communication from surgeons (β=0.30; p<0.001) and medical oncologists (β=0.26; p<0.001). Patient communication style preference moderated the association between physician communication style received and perceived decision quality.
CONCLUSION: Autonomy-supportive communication by physicians was associated with higher subjective decision quality among women with localized breast cancer. These results support future efforts to design interventions that enhance autonomy-supportive communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Autonomy-supportive communication by cancer doctors can improve patients' perceived decision quality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Decision making; Decision quality; Patient autonomy; Provider communication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27395750      PMCID: PMC5121061          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  49 in total

1.  Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Activating patients for smoking cessation through physician autonomy support.

Authors:  G C Williams; E L Deci
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Phyllis Butow; Stephanie Tesson; Frances Boyle
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; G P Maguire; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

5.  Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Omodole Ayeni; Carmen Webb; Margo Bettger-Hahn; Olubukunola Ayeni; Nadia Mychailyshyn
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients' quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  L M Ong; M R Visser; F B Lammes; J C de Haes
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-09

8.  Latina patient perspectives about informed treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

9.  The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Williams; Christopher P Niemiec; Heather Patrick; Richard M Ryan; Edward L Deci
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-04-17

10.  Shared decision-making and patient control in radiation oncology: implications for patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Jacob E Shabason; Jun J Mao; Eitan S Frankel; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  19 in total

1.  Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Yun Li; Lawrence C An; Kenneth Resnicow; Nancy K Janz; Michael S Sabel; Kevin C Ward; Angela Fagerlin; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Timothy P Hofer; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A Qualitative Analysis of the Preoperative Needs of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Susan C Pitt; Elizabeth Wendt; Megan C Saucke; Corrine I Voils; Jason Orne; Cameron L Macdonald; Nadine P Connor; Rebecca S Sippel
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-01-05

Review 4.  Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sophie Lelorain
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Patient Reactions to Surgeon Recommendations About Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Nancy K Janz; Paul Abrahamse; Lauren P Wallner; Sarah T Hawley; Lawrence C An; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.681

6.  The association between patient attitudes and values and the strength of consideration for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a population-based sample of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Kent A Griffith; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Monica Morrow; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 6.921

7.  Understanding the engagement of key decision support persons in patient decision making around breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Christine M Veenstra; Lauren P Wallner; Paul H Abrahamse; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 6.921

8.  Patient-Perceived Lack of Choice in Receipt of Radioactive Iodine for Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; David Reyes-Gastelum; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Sarah T Hawley; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 50.717

9.  Multilevel Factors Associated With More Intensive Use of Radioactive Iodine for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Mousumi Banerjee; David Reyes-Gastelum; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Carrie Lubitz; Sarah T Hawley; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  'It is like learning how to live all over again' A systematic review of people's experiences of living with a chronic illness from a self-determination theory perspective.

Authors:  Daniela Eassey; Helen K Reddel; Kath Ryan; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.