Literature DB >> 25043670

Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options.

Claire Temple-Oberle1, Omodole Ayeni, Carmen Webb, Margo Bettger-Hahn, Olubukunola Ayeni, Nadia Mychailyshyn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A person-centered approach to co-decision-making using tailored information respects each woman's preferences and may heighten breast reconstruction satisfaction.
METHODS: Women seeking breast reconstruction underwent initial and follow-up consultations wherein suitable options were discussed, and take-away material, balanced website links, and access to a nurse specialist and peer volunteers was provided. After reconstruction, the BRECON-31(©) was administered and analyzed in three groups: autologous, alloplastic, and latissimus dorsi (LD)/implant. BRECON-31(©) subscale scores were compared between the groups, and multiple regression used to determine if the type of reconstruction independently predicted satisfaction.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty three of 176 (70%) women completed the questionnaire (43% autologous, 47% alloplastic, and 10% LD/implant reconstructions). The LD/implant group had a low rate of immediate reconstruction (8.3%, P = 0.04), and the highest rate of chemotherapy (91.7%, P = 0.002) and radiation (100%, P = 0.003). The alloplastic group had a high rate of bilateral reconstruction (86.8%, P = 0.01). All groups scored well on the self-image, arm concerns, intimacy, satisfaction, and expectations subscales. All groups scored moderately on the self-consciousness, appearance, and nipple subscales. The autologous group scored the lowest on recovery (51 vs. 68 and 65, P < 0.0001) and only moderately well on the abdomen subscale (67). Multiple regression analysis showed that satisfaction was not driven by type of reconstruction (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: High satisfaction can be achieved using a person-centered approach by providing detailed information, appreciating each woman's unique features, and tailoring the reconstruction plan to the individual. Recovery remains a particular challenge, especially for women undergoing autologous reconstruction.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast; cancer; person-centered care; satisfaction; types of reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25043670     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  15 in total

1.  Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Ken Resnicow; Geoffrey C Williams; Marlene Silva; Paul Abrahamse; Dean A Shumway; Lauren P Wallner; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-22

Review 2.  Women's expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan Brennan; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Delivering Breast Reconstruction Information to Patients-Part 2: Women Report on Preferred Information Content.

Authors:  Natalie Jacox; Carmen Webb; Vishal Sharma; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Radiation of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eva Thiboutot; Peter Craighead; Carmen Webb; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 5.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

6.  Reliability and validity of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire in lung cancer.

Authors:  K Cheung; M de Mol; S Visser; B L Den Oudsten; B H Stricker; J G J V Aerts
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Sara T Brookes; Christopher Holcombe; Joseph A Ward; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm.

Authors:  Eoin M McFadden; Beatriz Lopez-Obregon; Jill P Stone; Carmen E Webb; Claire F Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17

9.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Enables Safe Same-Day Discharge After Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Danielle O Dumestre; Jennifer Redwood; Carmen E Webb; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Delivering Breast Reconstruction Information to Patients: Women Report on Preferred Information Delivery Styles and Options.

Authors:  Carmen Webb; Vishal Sharma; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.