Literature DB >> 29364772

Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sarah T Hawley1, Yun Li1, Lawrence C An1, Kenneth Resnicow1, Nancy K Janz1, Michael S Sabel1, Kevin C Ward1, Angela Fagerlin1, Monica Morrow1, Reshma Jagsi1, Timothy P Hofer1, Steven J Katz1.   

Abstract

Purpose This study was conducted to determine the effect of iCanDecide, an interactive and tailored breast cancer treatment decision tool, on the rate of high-quality patient decisions-both informed and values concordant-regarding locoregional breast cancer treatment and on patient appraisal of decision making. Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial of newly diagnosed patients with early-stage breast cancer making locoregional treatment decisions. From 22 surgical practices, 537 patients were recruited and randomly assigned online to the iCanDecide interactive and tailored Web site (intervention) or the iCanDecide static Web site (control). Participants completed a baseline survey and were mailed a follow-up survey 4 to 5 weeks after enrollment to assess the primary outcome of a high-quality decision, which consisted of two components, high knowledge and values-concordant treatment, and secondary outcomes (decision preparation, deliberation, and subjective decision quality). Results Patients in the intervention arm had higher odds of making a high-quality decision than did those in the control arm (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.92; P = .0004), which was driven primarily by differences in the rates of high knowledge between groups. The majority of patients in both arms made values-concordant treatment decisions (78.6% in the intervention arm and 81.4% in the control arm). More patients in the intervention arm had high decision preparation (estimate, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34; P = .027), but there were no significant differences in the other decision appraisal outcomes. The effect of the intervention was similar for women who were leaning strongly toward a treatment option at enrollment compared with those who were not. Conclusion The tailored and interactive iCanDecide Web site, which focused on knowledge building and values clarification, positively affected high-quality decisions largely by improving knowledge compared with static online information. To be effective, future patient-facing decision tools should be integrated into the clinical workflow to improve decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29364772      PMCID: PMC5946719          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.8442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  43 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Michael J Barry; Carol L Bennett; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Validation of a preparation for decision making scale.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Ian D Graham; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Stephen A Kearing; Kate F Clay; Annette M O'Connor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-06-26

3.  A framework for the study of access to medical care.

Authors:  L A Aday; R Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Phyllis Butow; Stephanie Tesson; Frances Boyle
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Latina patient perspectives about informed treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

7.  Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy?

Authors:  E Dale Collins; Caroline P Moore; Kate F Clay; Stephen A Kearing; Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Richard J Barth; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Jeffrey K Belkora; Yuchiao Chang; Carol Cosenza; Carrie A Levin; Beverly Moy; Ann Partridge; Clara N Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Online Social Engagement by Cancer Patients: A Clinic-Based Patient Survey.

Authors:  Lawrence C An; Lauren Wallner; Matthias Alexander Kirch
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2016-08-19

10.  Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer.

Authors:  A Vodermaier; C Caspari; J Koehm; S Kahlert; N Ditsch; M Untch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  Age at Diagnosis and Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in AML: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Meaningful Benefits.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Norah L Crossnohere; Jaein Seo; Elihu Estey; Bernadette O'Donoghue; B Douglas Smith; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  [Effect of gap junction modulation on antitumor effects of adriamycin in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells].

Authors:  Guojun Jiang; Yaming Liu; Wanchen Zhao; Daoxin Wang; Shuying Dong; Xuhui Tong
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

3.  Financial Costs and Burden Related to Decisions for Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Rachel A Greenup; Christel Rushing; Laura Fish; Brittany M Campbell; Lisa Tolnitch; Terry Hyslop; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Stephanie B Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar; Evan R Myers; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Addressing the problem of overtreatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linda M Pak; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.627

5.  Addressing the Dilemma of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy With Behavioral Science.

Authors:  Greg D Sacks; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Acceptability of 3D-printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Lumarie Santiago; Robert J Volk; Cristina M Checka; Dalliah Black; Joanna Lee; Jessica S Colen; Catherine Akay; Abigail Caudle; Henry Kuerer; Elsa M Arribas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Patient Perspectives on the Financial Costs and Burdens of Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Christel Rushing; Whitney Lane; Terry Hyslop; Anaeze C Offodile; Stephanie B Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar; Rachel Greenup; Laura J Fish
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-10

8.  Web-Based Medical Information Searching by Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer and its Influence on Survival: Observational Study.

Authors:  Yan Li; Shan Ye; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Hailing Guo; Yan Lin; Xiaohui Zhang; Songjie Shen; Na Shi; Xiaojie Wang; Qiang Sun
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Choice of local therapy for young women with early-stage breast cancer who have young-aged children.

Authors:  I-Wen Pan; Tina W F Yen; Jinhai Huo; Cheng Chen; Benjamin D Smith; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.921

10.  Motivations, Barriers, and Outcomes of Patient-Reported Shared Decision Making in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Joy W Chang; Joel H Rubenstein; Jessica L Mellinger; Ellyn Kodroff; Mary J Strobel; Melissa Scott; Denise Mack; Wendy Book; Kathleen Sable; Scholeigh Kyle; Allisa Paliana; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.