Literature DB >> 27017240

A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer.

Phyllis Butow1, Stephanie Tesson1, Frances Boyle2.   

Abstract

Several complex treatment decisions may be offered to women with early stage breast cancer, about a range of treatments from different modalities including surgery, radiotherapy, and endocrine and chemotherapy. Decision aids can facilitate shared decision-making and improve decision-related outcomes. We aimed to systematically identify, describe and appraise the literature on treatment decision aids for women with early breast cancer, synthesise the data and identify breast cancer decisions that lack a decision aid. A prospectively developed search strategy was applied to MEDLINE, the Cochrane databases, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and abstract databases from major conferences. Data were extracted into a pre-piloted form. Quality and risk of bias were measured using Qualsyst criteria. Results were synthesised into narrative format. Thirty-three eligible articles were identified, evaluating 23 individual treatment decision aids, comprising 13 randomised controlled trial reports, seven non-randomised comparative studies, eight single-arm pre-post studies and five cross-sectional studies. The decisions addressed by these decision aids were: breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy (+/- reconstruction); use of chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy; radiotherapy; and fertility preservation. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, precluding meta-analysis. Decisional conflict decreased, and knowledge and satisfaction increased, without any change in anxiety or depression, in most studies. No studies were identified that evaluated decision aids for neoadjuvant systemic therapy, or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Decision aids are available and improved decision-related outcomes for many breast cancer treatment decisions including surgery, radiotherapy, and endocrine and chemotherapy. Decision aids for neoadjuvant systemic therapy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy could not be found, and may be warranted.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Decision aid; Decision making; Systematic review; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017240     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  38 in total

1.  Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Ken Resnicow; Geoffrey C Williams; Marlene Silva; Paul Abrahamse; Dean A Shumway; Lauren P Wallner; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-22

2.  Improving Communication in Breast Cancer Treatment Consultation: Use of a Computer Test of Health Numeracy.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cindy M Walker; Alicia J Smallwood; Denisse Gil; Arshia Faghri; Amanda L Kong; Tina W Yen; Susan McDunn; Elizabeth Marcus; Joan M Neuner
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Discussions about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among surgical oncology providers and women with sporadic breast cancer: a content analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Abenaa M Brewster; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Yun Li; Lawrence C An; Kenneth Resnicow; Nancy K Janz; Michael S Sabel; Kevin C Ward; Angela Fagerlin; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Timothy P Hofer; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Understanding patients' values and preferences regarding early stage lung cancer treatment decision making.

Authors:  Donald R Sullivan; Karen B Eden; Nathan F Dieckmann; Sara E Golden; Kelly C Vranas; Shannon M Nugent; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 6.  A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Kristina Demas Woodhouse; Katie Tremont; Anil Vachani; Marilyn M Schapira; Neha Vapiwala; Charles B Simone; Abigail T Berman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patient decision aid for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for use in the consultation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J E Squires; D Stacey; M Coughlin; M Greenough; A Roberts; K Dorrance; M Clemons; J M Caudrelier; I D Graham; J Zhang; M Demery Varin; A Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Priorities of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer patients at diagnosis and after treatment.

Authors:  Melina J Windon; Carole Fakhry; Farhoud Faraji; Tanya Troy; Christine G Gourin; Ana P Kiess; Wayne Koch; David W Eisele; Gypsyamber D'Souza
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.337

9.  The effects of a video-based education in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer in Singapore.

Authors:  May Leng Tan; Kim Hua Lee; Wei Sean Yong; Cheryl Rodgers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Effect of a multilevel implementation programme on shared decision-making in breast cancer care.

Authors:  H van Veenendaal; H Voogdt-Pruis; D T Ubbink; C G J M Hilders
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.