Literature DB >> 27385795

Representing multiple object weights: competing priors and sensorimotor memories.

Lee A Baugh1, Amelie Yak1, Roland S Johansson2, J Randall Flanagan3.   

Abstract

When lifting an object, individuals scale lifting forces based on long-term priors relating external object properties (such as material and size) to object weight. When experiencing objects that are poorly predicted by priors, people rapidly form and update sensorimotor memories that can be used to predict an object's atypical size-weight relation in support of predictively scaling lift forces. With extensive experience in lifting such objects, long-term priors, assessed with weight judgments, are gradually updated. The aim of the present study was to understand the formation and updating of these memory processes. Participants lifted, over multiple days, a set of black cubes with a normal size-weight mapping and green cubes with an inverse size-weight mapping. Sensorimotor memory was assessed with lifting forces, and priors associated with the black and green cubes were assessed with the size-weight illusion (SWI). Interference was observed in terms of adaptation of the SWI, indicating that priors were not independently adjusted. Half of the participants rapidly learned to scale lift forces appropriately, whereas reduced learning was observed in the others, suggesting that individual differences may be affecting sensorimotor memory abilities. A follow-up experiment showed that lifting forces are not accurately scaled to objects when concurrently performing a visuomotor association task, suggesting that sensorimotor memory formation involves cognitive resources to instantiate the mapping between object identity and weight, potentially explaining the results of experiment 1 These results provide novel insight into the formation and updating of sensorimotor memories and provide support for the independent adjustment of sensorimotor memory and priors.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  object lifting; sensorimotor integration; sensorimotor memory; weight prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27385795      PMCID: PMC5144702          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00282.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; M A Beltzner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; A H Murray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Jennifer P Bittner; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting.

Authors:  Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Hans Bauer; Christian Marquardt; Georg Goldenberg; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The material-weight illusion induced by expectations alone.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Nathalie S Ranger; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  When is a weight not illusory?

Authors:  H E Ross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan; Evan Cesanek; Zhaoran Zhang; James N Ingram
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  The material-weight illusion is a Bayes-optimal percept under competing density priors.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Ling-Qi Zhang; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Cody G Freeman; Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.