Literature DB >> 18443767

Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force.

Kelly J Cole1.   

Abstract

The brain can accurately predict the forces needed to efficiently manipulate familiar objects in relation to mechanical properties such as weight. These predictions involve memory or some type of central representation, but visual analysis of size also yields accurate predictions of the needed fingertip forces. This raises the issue of which process (weight memory or visual size analysis) is used during everyday life when handling familiar objects. Our aim was to determine if subjects use a sensorimotor memory of weight, or a visual size analysis, to predictively set their vertical lift force when lifting a recently handled object. Two groups of subjects lifted an opaque brown bottle filled with water (470 g) during the first experimental session, and then rested for 15 min in a different room. Both groups were told that they would lift the same bottle in their next session. However, the experimental group returned to lift a slightly smaller bottle filled with water (360 g) that otherwise was identical in appearance to the first bottle. The control group returned to lift the same bottle from the first session, which was only partially filled with water so that it also weighed 360 g. At the end of the second session subjects were asked if they observed any changes between sessions, but no subject indicated awareness of a specific change. An acceleration ratio was computed by dividing the peak vertical acceleration during the first lift of the second session by the average peak acceleration of the last five lifts during the first session. This ratio was >1 for the control subjects 1.30 (SEM 0.08), indicating that they scaled their lift force for the first lift of the second session based on a memory of the (heavier) bottle from the first session. In contrast, the acceleration ratio was 0.94 (0.10) for the experimental group (P < 0.011). We conclude that the experimental group processed visual cues concerning the size of the bottle. These findings raise the possibility that even with familiar objects we predict fingertip forces using an on-line visual analysis of size (along with memory of density), rather than accessing memory related to object weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443767     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1392-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

2.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Visual pathways supporting perception and action in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  12 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Infants' grip strength predicts mu rhythm attenuation during observation of lifting actions with weighted blocks.

Authors:  Michaela B Upshaw; Raphael A Bernier; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Anticipatory scaling of grip forces when lifting objects of everyday life.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Sandra Eidenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Infants' prospective control during object manipulation in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  Janna M Gottwald; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan; Evan Cesanek; Zhaoran Zhang; James N Ingram
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 6.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The impact of left hemisphere stroke on force control with familiar and novel objects: neuroanatomic substrates and relationship to apraxia.

Authors:  Amanda M Dawson; Laurel J Buxbaum; Susan V Duff
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 1.784

9.  Representing multiple object weights: competing priors and sensorimotor memories.

Authors:  Lee A Baugh; Amelie Yak; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of visual cues of object density on perception and anticipatory control of dexterous manipulation.

Authors:  Céline Crajé; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.