Literature DB >> 19026545

Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights.

J Randall Flanagan1, Jennifer P Bittner, Roland S Johansson.   

Abstract

The expectation that object weight increases with size guides the control of manipulatory actions [1-6] and also influences weight perception. Thus, the size-weight illusion, whereby people perceive the smaller of two equally weighted objects to be heavier, is thought to arise because weight is judged relative to expected weight that, for a given family of objects, increases with size [2, 7]. Here, we show that the fundamental expectation that weight increases with size can be altered by experience and neither is hard-wired nor becomes crystallized during development. We demonstrate that multiday practice in lifting a set of blocks whose color and texture are the same and whose weights vary inversely with volume gradually attenuates and ultimately inverts the size-weight illusion tested with similar blocks. We also show that in contrast to this gradual change in the size-weight illusion, the sensorimotor system rapidly learns to predict the inverted object weights, as revealed by lift forces. Thus, our results indicate that distinct adaptive size-weight maps, or priors, underlie weight predictions made in lifting objects and in judging their weights. We suggest that size-weight priors that influence weight perception change slowly because they are based on entire families of objects. Size-weight priors supporting action are more flexible, and adapt more rapidly, because they are tuned to specific objects and their current state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026545     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  63 in total

1.  Error Detection is Critical for Visual-Motor Corrections.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The role of observers' gaze behaviour when watching object manipulation tasks: predicting and evaluating the consequences of action.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Gerben Rotman; Andreas F Reichelt; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Anticipatory scaling of grip forces when lifting objects of everyday life.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Sandra Eidenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Decoding tactile afferent activity to obtain an estimate of instantaneous force and torque applied to the fingerpad.

Authors:  Heba Khamis; Ingvars Birznieks; Stephen J Redmond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

9.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Superior size-weight illusion performance in patients with schizophrenia: evidence for deficits in forward models.

Authors:  Lisa E Williams; Vilayanur S Ramachandran; Edward M Hubbard; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.