Literature DB >> 27375895

trans-2,5-Di-methyl-piperazine-1,4-diium bis(perchlorate) dihydrate: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Cherifa Ben Mleh1, Thierry Roisnel2, Houda Marouani1.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title hydrated mol-ecular salt, C6H16N2 (2+)·2ClO4 (-)·2H2O, contains a half dication (completed by inversion symmetry), a perchlorate anion and a water mol-ecule. The extended structure consists of infinite chains of formula [(ClO4)H2O] n (n) (-) ions extending along the b axis linked by Ow-H⋯O (w = water) hydrogen bonds. These chains are cross-linked by the dications via N-H⋯Ow and weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, thus forming a three-dimensional supra-molecular network. Three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint maps reveal that the structure is dominated by H⋯O/O⋯H and H⋯H contacts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; mol­ecular salt; piperazine derivative

Year:  2016        PMID: 27375895      PMCID: PMC4910334          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901600520X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Piperazine (C4H10N2) and its derivatives are a family of strongly basic amines able to form dications, in which all of the N—H bonds are generally active in hydrogen-bond formation. They are used in pharmacology and found in biologically active compounds across a number of different therapeutic areas, displaying anti­bacterial, anti­fungal, anti­malarial, anti­psychotic, anti­depressant and anti­tumor activity (Brockunier et al., 2004 ▸; Bogatcheva et al., 2006 ▸). In this work, as part of our studies in this area, we report the preparation and structural investigation of a new hydrated perchlorate salt, C6H16N2 2+·2ClO4 −·2H2O (I).

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of (I) is composed of a half of a trans-2,5-dimethylpipeazine-1,4-dium dication, one perchlorate anion and one water mol­ecule (Fig. 1 ▸). The complete dication is generated by crystallographic inversion symmetry, leading to a typical chair conformation, with the methyl groups occupying equatorial positions [puckering parameters: Q = 0.7341 Å, θ = 90 and φ = −16 °], which is similar the conformation of the same species in its nitrate salt (Gatfaoui et al., 2014 ▸). Otherwise, the bond lengths and angle in the dication are normal (Rother et al., 1997 ▸; Gatfaoui et al., 2014 ▸; Essid et al., 2015 ▸).
Figure 1

An ORTEP view of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. Symmetry code: (i) −x + , −y + , −z.

The perchlorate anion displays its expected tetra­hedral geometry around the chlorine atom. Inter­atomic bond lengths and angles of the perchlorate anion lie respectively within the ranges [1.4327 (10)–1.4452 (11) Å] and [109.01 (7)- 110.28 (7) °]. Similar geometrical features have also been noticed in other crystal structures (Toumi Akriche et al., 2010 ▸; Berrah et al., 2012 ▸).

Supra­molecular features

In the extended structure, the anions are connected to the water mol­ecules through Ow—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), generating a corrugated (5) chain running along the [010] direction (Fig. 2 ▸). These chains are linked via the trans-2,5-dimethlpiperazine-1,4-diium cations through N—H⋯O, N—H⋯Ow and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular network (Fig. 3 ▸). These data show that each organic cation is connected to six inorganic chains.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
OW—H1W⋯O1i 0.85 (1)2.03 (1)2.8637 (16)167 (2)
OW—H2W⋯O2ii 0.85 (1)2.23 (1)2.9932 (16)150 (2)
N1—H1N⋯O4iii 0.902.182.9067 (15)137
N1—H1N⋯O3iv 0.902.423.0293 (15)125
N1—H1N⋯OW v 0.902.553.1994 (16)130
N1—H2N⋯OW i 0.901.912.8019 (15)172
C1—H1B⋯O3iv 0.972.563.1007 (17)116

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

Figure 2

Hydrogen-bonded supra­molecular chains involving anions and water mol­ecules of compound (I), represented through the ab plane.

Figure 3

Projection of (I) along the b axis. The H-atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding are omitted.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

The three-dimensional Hirshfeld surfaces and two-dimensional fingerprint plots of (I) were prepared using CrystalExplorer (Wolff et al., 2012 ▸) and are shown in Figs. 4 ▸ and 5 ▸, respectively. The inter­action between N—H and oxygen atoms can be seen in the Hirshfeld surface as the bright-red area in Fig. 4 ▸ (labeled a). The light-red spots are due to Ow—H⋯O inter­actions (labeled b). For the salt, O⋯H/H⋯O contacts, which are attributed to N—H⋯Ow and Ow—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions, appear as two sharp symmetric spikes in the two-dimensional fingerprint maps. They have the most significant contribution to the total Hirshfeld surfaces. The H⋯H contacts appear in the middle of the scattered points in the two-dimensional fingerprint maps. For further information on Hirshfeld surfaces, see: Spackman & McKinnon (2002 ▸) and Spackman & Jayatilaka (2009 ▸).
Figure 4

Hirshfeld surface around the constituents of (I) coloured according to d norm. The surfaces are shown as transparent to allow visualization of the orientation and conformation of the functional groups.

Figure 5

Fingerprint plots of the major contacts: (a) H⋯O and (b) H⋯H.

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared from an alcoholic solution containing trans-2,5-di­methyl­piparazine (0.1 g, 1 mmol, purity 99%, Aldrich) dissolved in ethanol (20 ml) and perchloric acid HClO4 (0.2 g, 2 mmol, purity 96%, Aldrich) with a molar ratio of 1:2. This mixture was stirred for 1 h. After a week of evaporation at room temperature, colorless single crystals of suitable dimensions for crystallographic study were formed, and were isolated by filtration and washed with a small amount of distilled water. The crystals can be stable for months under normal conditions of temperature and humidity.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All H atoms were located in a difference map but were placed geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.96 Å (meth­yl), or 0.98 Å (methine), N—H = 0.90 Å (NH2) with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C or N). The H atoms of the water mol­ecule were refined with a distance restraint of O—H = 0.85 (1) Å using DFIX and DANG commands (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H16N2 2+·2ClO4 ·2H2O
M r 351.14
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)16.8603 (8), 7.2655 (3), 14.4534 (6)
β (°)128.751 (1)
V3)1380.78 (10)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.52
Crystal size (mm)0.44 × 0.29 × 0.25
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.775, 0.878
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections7760, 1557, 1457
R int 0.023
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.649
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.028, 0.074, 1.13
No. of reflections1557
No. of parameters100
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.34, −0.41

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▸), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX publication routines (Farrugia, 2012 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901600520X/hb7574sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901600520X/hb7574Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1470800 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H16N22+·2ClO4·2H2OF(000) = 736
Mr = 351.14Dx = 1.689 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.8603 (8) ÅCell parameters from 7552 reflections
b = 7.2655 (3) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
c = 14.4534 (6) ŵ = 0.52 mm1
β = 128.751 (1)°T = 150 K
V = 1380.78 (10) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.44 × 0.29 × 0.25 mm
D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS diffractometer1557 independent reflections
Radiation source: Incoatec microfocus sealed tube1457 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Multilayer monochromatorRint = 0.023
rotation images scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)h = −21→21
Tmin = 0.775, Tmax = 0.878k = −9→9
7760 measured reflectionsl = −18→15
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.074H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.13w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0308P)2 + 1.9533P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1557 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
100 parametersΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −0.41 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.09748 (2)0.13197 (4)0.16201 (3)0.01195 (12)
O10.14991 (10)0.26958 (16)0.25415 (10)0.0307 (3)
O20.16959 (8)−0.00473 (16)0.18348 (11)0.0254 (3)
O30.02214 (9)0.04530 (16)0.16384 (10)0.0239 (3)
O40.05035 (9)0.21898 (16)0.04934 (9)0.0236 (3)
OW0.40676 (9)0.84994 (14)0.78311 (9)0.0203 (2)
H1W0.3881 (18)0.9600 (15)0.780 (2)0.046 (7)*
H2W0.3837 (15)0.780 (2)0.8086 (18)0.034 (6)*
N10.14181 (8)0.75580 (15)0.43347 (10)0.0111 (2)
H2N0.12010.72080.36120.013*
H1N0.08670.77740.42860.013*
C10.20218 (10)0.92935 (18)0.46870 (12)0.0119 (3)
H1A0.22200.97200.54420.014*
H1B0.16051.02390.40990.014*
C20.20319 (10)0.60230 (18)0.52072 (11)0.0114 (3)
H20.22430.63960.59840.014*
C30.13915 (11)0.42938 (19)0.48147 (13)0.0186 (3)
H3A0.08010.45420.47540.028*
H3B0.17850.33340.53850.028*
H3C0.11830.39110.40560.028*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.01181 (18)0.01242 (18)0.01379 (18)−0.00022 (10)0.00907 (14)0.00166 (10)
O10.0321 (6)0.0200 (6)0.0225 (6)−0.0075 (5)0.0085 (5)−0.0069 (5)
O20.0215 (6)0.0256 (6)0.0347 (6)0.0119 (5)0.0203 (5)0.0101 (5)
O30.0246 (6)0.0246 (6)0.0358 (6)−0.0064 (4)0.0253 (5)−0.0012 (5)
O40.0269 (6)0.0308 (6)0.0190 (5)0.0105 (5)0.0171 (5)0.0119 (4)
OW0.0272 (6)0.0152 (5)0.0174 (5)−0.0013 (4)0.0135 (5)0.0000 (4)
N10.0077 (5)0.0131 (5)0.0124 (5)0.0006 (4)0.0062 (4)0.0008 (4)
C10.0120 (6)0.0101 (6)0.0142 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0084 (5)0.0006 (5)
C20.0110 (6)0.0113 (6)0.0122 (6)0.0008 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0020 (5)
C30.0163 (6)0.0139 (6)0.0230 (7)−0.0034 (5)0.0111 (6)0.0008 (5)
Cl1—O31.4327 (10)C1—C2i1.5218 (17)
Cl1—O41.4363 (10)C1—H1A0.9700
Cl1—O11.4425 (11)C1—H1B0.9700
Cl1—O21.4452 (11)C2—C31.5163 (18)
OW—H1W0.850 (9)C2—C1i1.5218 (17)
OW—H2W0.850 (9)C2—H20.9800
N1—C11.4955 (16)C3—H3A0.9600
N1—C21.5071 (16)C3—H3B0.9600
N1—H2N0.9000C3—H3C0.9600
N1—H1N0.9000
O3—Cl1—O4110.28 (7)N1—C1—H1B109.5
O3—Cl1—O1109.01 (7)C2i—C1—H1B109.5
O4—Cl1—O1109.03 (7)H1A—C1—H1B108.1
O3—Cl1—O2109.29 (7)N1—C2—C3110.17 (10)
O4—Cl1—O2109.87 (7)N1—C2—C1i108.88 (10)
O1—Cl1—O2109.34 (7)C3—C2—C1i111.63 (11)
H1W—OW—H2W109.1 (17)N1—C2—H2108.7
C1—N1—C2111.99 (10)C3—C2—H2108.7
C1—N1—H2N109.2C1i—C2—H2108.7
C2—N1—H2N109.2C2—C3—H3A109.5
C1—N1—H1N109.2C2—C3—H3B109.5
C2—N1—H1N109.2H3A—C3—H3B109.5
H2N—N1—H1N107.9C2—C3—H3C109.5
N1—C1—C2i110.74 (10)H3A—C3—H3C109.5
N1—C1—H1A109.5H3B—C3—H3C109.5
C2i—C1—H1A109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
OW—H1W···O1i0.85 (1)2.03 (1)2.8637 (16)167 (2)
OW—H2W···O2ii0.85 (1)2.23 (1)2.9932 (16)150 (2)
N1—H1N···O4iii0.902.182.9067 (15)137
N1—H1N···O3iv0.902.423.0293 (15)125
N1—H1N···OWv0.902.553.1994 (16)130
N1—H2N···OWi0.901.912.8019 (15)172
C1—H1B···O3iv0.972.563.1007 (17)116
  6 in total

1.  Identification of new diamine scaffolds with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Elena Bogatcheva; Colleen Hanrahan; Boris Nikonenko; Rowena Samala; Ping Chen; Jacqueline Gearhart; Francis Barbosa; Leo Einck; Carol A Nacy; Marina Protopopova
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Substituted piperazines as novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors.

Authors:  Linda L Brockunier; Jiafang He; Lawrence F Colwell; Bahanu Habulihaz; Huaibing He; Barbara Leiting; Kathryn A Lyons; Frank Marsilio; Reshma A Patel; Yohannes Teffera; Joseph K Wu; Nancy A Thornberry; Ann E Weber; Emma R Parmee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  2-Amino-3-nitro-pyridinium perchlorate.

Authors:  Samah Toumi Akriche; Mohamed Rzaigui; Noura Al-Hokbany; Refaat Mohamed Mahfouz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-01-09

4.  2-Amino-3-carb-oxy-pyridinium perchlorate.

Authors:  Fadila Berrah; Sofiane Bouacida; Hayet Anana; Thierry Roisnel
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-02

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  trans-2,5-Di-methyl-piperazine-1,4-diium dinitrate.

Authors:  Sofian Gatfaoui; Thierry Roisnel; Hassouna Dhaouadi; Houda Marouani
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.