Literature DB >> 12412896

Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.

Calion B Lockridge1, Susan E Brennan.   

Abstract

A current debate in psycholinguistics concerns how speakers take addressees' knowledge or needs into account during the packaging of utterances. In retelling stories, speakers are more likely to mention atypical instruments than easily inferrable, typical instruments; in a seminal study, Brown and Dell (1987) suggested that this is not an adjustment to addressees but is simply easiest for speakers. They concluded that manipulating addressees' knowledge did not affect speakers' mention of instruments. However, their addressees were confederates who heard the same stories repeatedly. We had speakers retell stories to naive addressees who either saw or did not see a picture illustrating the main action and instrument. When addressees lacked pictures, speakers were more likely to mention atypical instruments, to mention them early (within the same clause as the action verb), and to mark atypical instruments as indefinite. This suggests that with visual copresence, speakers can take addressees' knowledge into account in early syntactic choices.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412896     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production.

Authors:  V S Ferreira; G S Dell
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know.

Authors:  S R Fussell; R M Krauss
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-03

3.  When do speakers take into account common ground?

Authors:  W S Horton; B Keysar
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-04

4.  Common ground and everyday language use: comments on Horton and Keysar (1996)

Authors:  J W Polichak; R J Gerrig
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-05

5.  Speaking with common ground: from principles to processes in pragmatics: a reply to Polichak and Gerrig.

Authors:  B Keysar; W S Horton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-05

6.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.

Authors:  S E Brennan; H H Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination.

Authors:  S Garrod; A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

8.  The development of communication skills: modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener.

Authors:  M Shatz; R Gelman
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1973

9.  Listeners as co-narrators.

Authors:  J B Bavelas; L Coates; T Johnson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-12

10.  Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication.

Authors:  R M Krauss; S Weinheimer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1966-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  Function and context affect spatial information packaging at multiple levels.

Authors:  Elena Andonova; Thora Tenbrink; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Spatial Language and the Embedded Listener Model in Parents' Input to Children.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Malena Silva; Colin Wilson; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Driving impairs talking.

Authors:  Ensar Becic; Gary S Dell; Kathryn Bock; Susan M Garnsey; Tate Kubose; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

4.  The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?

Authors:  Liane Wardlow Lane; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-08-06

8.  Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

Authors:  Esteban Buz; Michael K Tanenhaus; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.