Literature DB >> 33043066

Investigating the effects of phonological neighbors on word retrieval and phonetic variation in word naming and picture naming paradigms.

Haoyun Zhang1, Matthew T Carlson1, Michele T Diaz1.   

Abstract

Phonological neighbors have been shown to affect word processing. Prior work has shown that when a word with an initial voiceless stop has a contrasting initial voiced stop neighbor, Voice Onset Times (VOTs) are longer. Higher phonological neighborhood density (PND) has also been shown to facilitate word retrieval latency, and be associated with longer VOTs. However, these effects have rarely been investigated with picture naming, which is thought to be a more semantically driven task. The current study examined the effects of phonological neighbors on word retrieval times and phonetic variation, and how these effects differed in word naming and picture naming paradigms. Results showed that PND was positively correlated with longer VOT in both paradigms. Furthermore, the effect of initial stop neighbors on VOTs was only significant in word naming. These results highlight the influence of phonological neighbors on word production in different paradigms, support interactive models of word production, and suggest that hyper-articulation in speech does not solely depend on communicative context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interactive effects; Language production; Minimal Pair; Phonological neighborhood density; Voice Onset Time

Year:  2019        PMID: 33043066      PMCID: PMC7540183          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1686529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  32 in total

1.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production.

Authors:  B Rapp; M Goldrick
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Semantic effects in word naming: evidence from English and Japanese Kanji.

Authors:  Naoki Shibahara; Marco Zorzi; Martin P Hill; Taeko Wydell; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-02

3.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

4.  Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Gordon D A Brown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

5.  Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis.

Authors:  Jasmin Sadat; Clara D Martin; Albert Costa; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.

Authors:  G S Dell; M F Schwartz; N Martin; E M Saffran; D A Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.

Authors:  Melissa Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-01

8.  Age-related differences in the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Micah A Johnson; Deborah M Burke; David J Madden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

Authors:  Esteban Buz; Michael K Tanenhaus; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Moreno-Martínez; Pedro R Montoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language.

Authors:  Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  Neural sensitivity to phonological characteristics is stable across the lifespan.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Hossein Karimi; Sara B W Troutman; Victoria H Gertel; Abigail L Cosgrove; Haoyun Zhang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.