Literature DB >> 18614390

Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory.

Julia Trommershäuser1, Laurence T Maloney, Michael S Landy.   

Abstract

We discuss behavioral studies directed at understanding how probability information is represented in motor and economic tasks. By formulating the behavioral tasks in the language of statistical decision theory, we can compare performance in equivalent tasks in different domains. Subjects in traditional economic decision-making tasks often misrepresent the probability of rare events and typically fail to maximize expected gain. By contrast, subjects in mathematically equivalent movement tasks often choose movement strategies that come close to maximizing expected gain. We discuss the implications of these different outcomes, noting the evident differences between the source of uncertainty and how information about uncertainty is acquired in motor and economic tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614390      PMCID: PMC2678412          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  34 in total

1.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements.

Authors:  T Kaminski; A M Gentile
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision.

Authors:  Paul W Glimcher; Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Peter Dayan; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Optimal compensation for temporal uncertainty in movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  106 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Dynamic integration of information about salience and value for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; Julia Trommershäuser; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Robust visual estimation as source separation.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Manish Singh; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Planning multiple movements within a fixed time limit: the cost of constrained time allocation in a visuo-motor task.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Shih-Wei Wu; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Emotion and reward are dissociable from error during motor learning.

Authors:  Sara B Festini; Stephanie D Preston; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Mice take calculated risks.

Authors:  Aaron Kheifets; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Eye-hand coordination while pointing rapidly under risk.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Martin Stritzke; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good.

Authors:  Andreas Jarvstad; Ulrike Hahn; Simon K Rushton; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  No bridge too high: infants decide whether to cross based on the probability of falling not the severity of the potential fall.

Authors:  Kari S Kretch; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.