Literature DB >> 2736229

The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme.

P H Peeters1, A L Verbeek, J H Hendriks, R Holland, M Mravunac, G P Vooijs.   

Abstract

Since January 1975 a population-based screening programme for the early detection of breast cancer has been carried out in the city of Nijmegen. During five interscreening periods of 2 years each a total of 158 so-called interval cancers were diagnosed. Careful revision of all screening and diagnostic mammograms was executed. Of all interval cancers 26% were 'missed' at the previous screening examination (due to technical or observer error), 16% were radiographically occult at the time of diagnosis and 58% were 'true' interval cancers. Interval cancers were regarded as 'true' when an obvious lesion was observed on the diagnostic mammogram while no suspect signs were seen on the previous screening mammogram. The prevalence of 'missed' cancers did not decline in the course of the screening programme. Radiographically occult tumours were localised, mostly in Wolfe's P2/DY breast parenchyma (83%), 33% were lobular invasive and 25% ductal non-invasive. 'True' interval cancer cases (58%) showed the same overall survival as control breast cancer patients, diagnosed in a non-screening situation. Shortening the screening interval would reduce interval cancer rates and probably further decrease breast cancer mortality in a screened population. However, from the present series of interval cancers 63% would not have been prevented by an annual screening examination. As regards women under age 50 annual screening would still leave 66% of all interval cancers in this age group undetected. Probably more benefit will be gained by searching for new imaging techniques to reduce numbers of 'missed' cancers and to detect lobular invasive and ductal non-invasive cancers in dense breast parenchyma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736229      PMCID: PMC2246722          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  21 in total

1.  False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  P E Burns; M G Grace; A W Lees; C May
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1979-06

2.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

5.  Breast cancer missed by mammography.

Authors:  J E Martin; M Moskowitz; J R Milbrath
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evidence of breast cancer mortality reduction: aggressive screening in women under age 50.

Authors:  M Moskowitz; P S Gartside
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  So-called interval cancers of the breast. Pathologic and radiologic analysis of sixty-four cases.

Authors:  R Holland; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; B V Bekker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Features of mammorgraphically negative breast tumours.

Authors:  C J Cahill; P S Boulter; N M Gibbs; J L Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  18 in total

1.  High expression of the trefoil protein TFF1 in interval breast cancers.

Authors:  M Crosier; D Scott; R G Wilson; C D Griffiths; F E May; B R Westley
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.

Authors:  D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; S Di Michele; P Tuttobene; C Fantò; M Valentini; M Gentilini; S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable?

Authors:  D Asbury; C R Boggis; D Sheals; A G Threlfall; C B Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-30

4.  A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M N Vipond; E Kutt; J D Davies; A J Webb; J R Farndon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  What should be done about interval breast cancers?

Authors:  S Field; M J Michell; M G Wallis; A R Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

6.  A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme.

Authors:  W K Cowan; B Angus; J C Gray; L G Lunt; S R al-Tamimi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The epidemiological profile of women with an interval cancer in the DOM screening programme.

Authors:  C T Brekelmans; P H Peeters; J A Faber; J J Deurenberg; H J Collette
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populations.

Authors:  A R Hart; A C Wicks; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.

Authors:  C B Woodman; A G Threlfall; C R Boggis; P Prior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

10.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J O Zaat; A R Koomen; D Willebrand
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.