Literature DB >> 7866124

Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.

C B Woodman1, A G Threlfall, C R Boggis, P Prior.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the detection rate of interval cancers in women screened by the NHS breast screening programme.
DESIGN: Detection of interval cancers by computer linkage of records held by the screening centres in the North Western Regional Health Authority with breast cancer registrations at the regional cancer registry.
SETTING: North Western Regional Health Authority.
SUBJECTS: 137,421 women screened between 1 March 1988 and 31 March 1992 who had a negative screening result.
RESULTS: 297 invasive interval cancers were detected. The rate of detection of interval cancers expressed as a proportion of the underlying incidence was 31% in the first 12 months after screening, 52% between 12 and 24 months, and 82% between 24 and 36 months.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of interval cancers in the third year after breast screening approaches that which would have been expected in the absence of screening and suggests that the three year interval between screens is too long.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7866124      PMCID: PMC2548620          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.

Authors:  L W Bassett; D H Bunnell; R Jahanshahi; R H Gold; R D Arndt; J Linsman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  J A van Dijck; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  National Health Service breast screening programme results for 1991-2.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; S M Moss; A E Kirkpatrick; M Michell; L Johns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-07

7.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme.

Authors:  P H Peeters; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; G P Vooijs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.

Authors:  L Tabár; G Faberberg; N E Day; L Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Is clinical breast examination an acceptable alternative to mammographic screening?

Authors:  I Mittra; M Baum; H Thornton; J Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

2.  Screening and litigation. The rate of interval cancers is too high.

Authors:  J R Benson; A D Purushotham; R Warren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

3.  Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.

Authors:  J D Otten; J A van Dijck; P G Peer; H Straatman; A L Verbeek; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Extending the benefits of breast cancer screening. Still hard to know how large the benefits will really be.

Authors:  U Werneke; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

5.  NHS breast screening programme. Both extended age range and reduced screening interval are needed.

Authors:  H Goodare; M King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

6.  Survival rates from interval cancer in NHS breast screening programme.

Authors:  S Collins; C B Woodman; A Threlfall; P Prior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-14

7.  NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable?

Authors:  D Asbury; C R Boggis; D Sheals; A G Threlfall; C B Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-30

8.  A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M N Vipond; E Kutt; J D Davies; A J Webb; J R Farndon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Risk factors of developing interval early gastric cancer after negative endoscopy.

Authors:  Young Sin Cho; Il-Kwun Chung; Ji Hyun Kim; Yunho Jung; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Incidence, detection, and tumour stage of breast cancer in a cohort of Italian women with negative screening mammography report recommending early (short-interval) rescreen.

Authors:  Alessandra Ravaioli; Flavia Foca; Americo Colamartini; Fabio Falcini; Carlo Naldoni; Alba C Finarelli; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.