Literature DB >> 27342612

The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Lindsay Tetreault1, Branko Kopjar2, Aria Nouri1, Paul Arnold3, Giuseppe Barbagallo4, Ronald Bartels5, Zhou Qiang6, Anoushka Singh1, Mehmet Zileli7, Alexander Vaccaro8, Michael G Fehlings9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine cut-offs between mild, moderate and severe myelopathy on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score.
METHODS: Between December 2005 and January 2011, 757 patients with clinically diagnosed DCM were enrolled in the prospective AOSpine North America (n = 278) or International (n = 479) study at 26 sites. Functional status and quality of life were evaluated at baseline using a variety of outcome measures. Using the Nurick score as an anchor, receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine cut-offs between mild, moderate and severe disease. The validity of the identified cut-offs was evaluated by examining whether patients in different severity groups differed in terms of impairment, disability, quality of life and number of signs and symptoms.
RESULTS: A mJOA of 14 was determined to be the cut-off between mild and moderate myelopathy and a mJOA of 11 was the cut-off score between moderate and severe disease. Patients in the severe myelopathy group (n = 254) had significantly reduced quality of life and functional status and a greater number of signs and symptoms compared to patients classified as mild (n = 190) or moderate (n = 296).
CONCLUSIONS: Mild myelopathy can be defined as mJOA from 15 to 17, moderate as mJOA from 12 to 14 and severe as mJOA from 0 to 11. These categories should be adopted worldwide to standardize clinical assessment of DCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defining disease severity; Degenerative cervical myelopathy; Functional impairment; Measurement; Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342612     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4660-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Branko Kopjar; Lindsay Tetreault; Suhkvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Mitchell J Campbell; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Spectrum of Related Disorders Affecting the Aging Spine.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Christina L Goldstein; Paul Arnold; James Harrop; Alan Hilibrand; Aria Nouri; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  K Yonenobu; K Abumi; K Nagata; E Taketomi; K Ueyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Spyridon K Karadimas; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  E C Benzel; J Lancon; L Kesterson; T Hadden
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-09

Review 7.  Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Anoushka Singh; Eric M Massicotte; Paul M Arnold; Darrel S Brodke; Daniel C Norvell; Jeffrey T Hermsmeyer; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Aria Nouri; Branko Kopjar; Pierre Côté; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  [Spondylotic cervical myelopathy : Indication of surgical treatment].

Authors:  W Pepke; H Almansour; M Richter; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Chronic posterior atlantoaxial subluxation associated with os odontoideum: a rare condition. A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn; Sombat Kunakornsawat; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Pritsanai Pruttikul; Warongporn Pongpinyopap
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2018-12-19

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Satoshi Maki; Masao Koda; Mitsuhiro Kitamura; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Yasushi Iijima; Junya Saito; Yoshitada Masuda; Koji Matsumoto; Masatoshi Kojima; Takayuki Obata; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Urinary Bother Are Common in Patients Undergoing Elective Cervical Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Lieberman; Stephanie Radoslovich; Lynn M Marshall; Jung U Yoo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Narihito Nagoshi; Osahiko Tsuji; Eijiro Okada; Nobuyuki Fujita; Mitsuru Yagi; Takashi Tsuji; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Gait assessment tools for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; Lingxiao Chen; Camila Quel De Oliveira; Arianne P Verhagen; Omprakash Damodaran; David B Anderson
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

8.  Analysis of risk factors and treatment outcome in patients presenting with neglected congenital spinal deformity and neurological deficit.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajavelu; Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Rishi Mukesh Kanna; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-10-19

9.  A deep learning model for detection of cervical spinal cord compression in MRI scans.

Authors:  Zamir Merali; Justin Z Wang; Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher D Witiw; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  COVID-19: Moral and Ethical Implications for Orthopaedic Spine Surgeons.

Authors:  Cris J Min; Cesar Iturriaga; Victoria Wang; Rohit Verma
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.