Literature DB >> 34665447

Analysis of risk factors and treatment outcome in patients presenting with neglected congenital spinal deformity and neurological deficit.

Rajesh Rajavelu1, Ajoy Prasad Shetty1, Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan1, Rishi Mukesh Kanna1, S Rajasekaran2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Congenital spinal deformities (CSD) are uncommon; and usually present during early childhood. Rarely, patients have been reported to present with neglected CSD in association with myelopathy. The current study reports the largest series of patients with neglected CSD and major neuro-deficit; and discusses their long-term outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with CSD who presented with myelopathy and underwent surgical management between January 2008 and January 2018. Only patients who had complete clinico-radiological records and completed minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Neurology was graded according to American Spinal Injury Association Impairment, Nurick and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Radiological details like deformity type, location, magnitude, and underlying anomaly were recorded. A comparative analysis of parameters between pre-operative and final follow-up periods was performed.
RESULTS: Thirty three (age = 21.1 ± 11.9 years) patients with CSD and myelopathy were included. Mean duration since myelopathy was 5.2 ± 6.2 months. Thirty (91%) patients presented with kyphosis or kyphoscoliosis; and 18 had upper thoracic-level lesion (12 and 3 with mid- or low-thoracic and lumbar lesions). 16 (48.5%) and 12 (36.4%) presented with types 1 and 3 anomalies, respectively. Mean pre-operative mJOA and Nurick grades were 8.8 ± 2.4 and 3.4 ± 0.7. Based on ASIA score, 2, 5, 21 and five patients presented with grades A, C, D and E, respectively. All patients underwent surgeries from posterior-only approach. Mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.6 years. In kyphoscoliosis group, coronal and sagittal Cobb improved by 23.8° and 25.9°, respectively. Mean deformity improved by 19.6° and 15.6° in scoliosis and kyphosis groups, respectively. Neurological status improved in 5, remained stable in 23 and deteriorated in five patients. Mean mJOA and Nurick grades at final follow-up was 8.3 ± 3.1and 3.4 ± 0.9.
CONCLUSION: Major neurological deficit is a rare complication of neglected CSD. In our series, such a presentation was observed in patients with kyphotic or kyphoscoliotic deformities, type 1 or 3 vertebral anomalies and proximal thoracic vertebral lesions. Surgery can be valuable in these patients, as it not only stabilises deformity, but also provides the best chance of preventing neuro-deterioration.
© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital spinal deformities; Kyphosis; Neglected deformities; Neurodeficit; Scoliosis; Vertebral anomalies

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34665447     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00427-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  19 in total

1.  Clinical analysis of thoracic ossified ligamentum flavum without ventral compressive lesion.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Yoon; Wook Ha Kim; Sang-Bong Chung; Yong Jun Jin; Kun Woo Park; Joon Woo Lee; Sang-Ki Chung; Ki-Jeong Kim; Jin S Yeom; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Chun Kee Chung; Heung Sik Kang; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Computer-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery for resection of ossification of the ligamentum flavum in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Qiang Yuan; Shan Zheng; Wei Tian
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Closing-opening wedge osteotomy to correct angular kyphotic deformity by a single posterior approach.

Authors:  N Kawahara; K Tomita; H Baba; T Kobayashi; T Fujita; H Murakami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis: a multicenter retrospective comparison of three surgical techniques.

Authors:  Burt Yaszay; Michael O'Brien; Harry L Shufflebarger; Randal R Betz; Baron Lonner; Suken A Shah; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Alvin Crawford; Lynn Letko; Jurgen Harms; Munish C Gupta; Paul D Sponseller; Mark F Abel; John Flynn; Angel Macagno; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Compressive myelopathy in severe angular kyphosis: a series of ten patients.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Zhang; Honggang Wang; Chao Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Compressive Myelopathy in Congenital Kyphosis of the Upper Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Study of 6 Cases.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Zhang; Honggang Wang; Wenjie Zheng
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Aria Nouri; Paul Arnold; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Ronald Bartels; Zhou Qiang; Anoushka Singh; Mehmet Zileli; Alexander Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis.

Authors:  M H H Noordeen; Enrique Garrido; Stewart K Tucker; Hazem Bayoumi Elsebaie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shenghua Li; Yunsheng Ou; Bo Liu; Yong Zhu; Zhengxue Quan; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 10.  Spinal osteotomies: indications, limits and pitfalls.

Authors:  Kamil Cagri Kose; Omer Bozduman; Ali Erkan Yenigul; Servet Igrek
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-04-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Efficacy of Single-Stage Correction by Posterior Approach for Neglected Congenital Scoliosis: Comparative Analysis According to the Age of Surgical Intervention.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Hong Jin Kim; Dong-Gune Chang; Seung Woo Suh; Yunjin Nam; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.