Literature DB >> 30792540

Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire.

Narihito Nagoshi1, Osahiko Tsuji1, Eijiro Okada1, Nobuyuki Fujita1, Mitsuru Yagi1, Takashi Tsuji2, Masaya Nakamura1, Morio Matsumoto1, Kota Watanabe3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: The old-version JOA score for cervical myelopathy (CM) is an evaluation system performed by medical providers that focuses only on neurological function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and to clarify clinical factors that affect the therapeutic effectiveness for CM.
SETTING: Single institute in Japan.
METHODS: We reviewed surgical outcomes for 126 CM patients who were treated by single open-door laminoplasty and were followed at least 2 years. We assessed clinical information, JOACMEQ, JOA scores, and radiographic parameters. Patients were grouped according to effective or ineffective surgical outcomes as defined by the JOACMEQ using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Laminoplasty resulted in functional improvement in the cervical spine and extremities for 40-50% of the patients, while bladder function showed only minimal recovery. Multivariable analyses revealed that a significant postoperative reduction in neck or shoulder pain influenced the effective functional recovery of the cervical spine. A reduction in arm or hand pain favorably affected the postoperative upper extremity function. Lower age and a postoperative decrease in limb pain were correlated with significantly improved function of the lower extremities. A postoperative reduction in arm pain enhanced the QOL recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: The JOACMEQ makes it possible to analyze multiple aspects of surgical outcomes for patients who undergo cervical spine surgery. Open-door laminoplasty did not provide favorable results for some patients, which highlights the importance of assessing the indications for this procedure and managing postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30792540     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0258-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  50 in total

1.  Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Hiroshi Takahashi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in the elderly.

Authors:  Hideki Nagashima; Yasuo Morio; Hideki Yamashita; Koji Yamane; Ryota Teshima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Postoperative factors affecting neurological recovery after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yuto Ogawa; Kazuhiro Chiba; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Hironari Takaishi; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-12

4.  Patient Satisfaction with Posterior Decompression Surgery for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Prognostic Radiographic Factors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Junichi Ohya; Yasushi Oshima; Hiroyuki Oka; Fumiko Saiki; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Sakae Tanaka; Hirotaka Chikuda; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index in postoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Shwu-Fen Wang; Wei-Li Hsu; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Motohiro Okada; Akihito Minamide; Toru Endo; Munehito Yoshida; Mamoru Kawakami; Muneharu Ando; Hiroshi Hashizume; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Maio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Correlations and time-dependent changes of upper arm performance tests, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and a newly developed patient-based outcome measure : the Japanese Orthopaedic Cervical Myelopathy Questionnaire.

Authors:  H Fujiwara; T Makino; K Yonenobu; H Honda; T Kaito
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23

9.  Riluzole attenuates neuropathic pain and enhances functional recovery in a rodent model of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Eun Su Moon; Spyridon K Karadimas; Wen-Ru Yu; James W Austin; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: part 3. Determination of reliability.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuo Yonenobu; Eiji Wada; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Effect of modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy on axial symptoms in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty].

Authors:  Hua Chen; Hao Liu; Yuxiao Deng; Quan Gong; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Posterior open-door laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates vs anchors: a comparative study of clinical efficacy and cervical sagittal balance.

Authors:  Dongyue Li; Yong Hai; Xianglong Meng; Jincai Yang; Peng Yin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients With Mild Kyphotic Cervical Alignment.

Authors:  Narihito Nagoshi; Satoshi Nori; Osahiko Tsuji; Satoshi Suzuki; Eijiro Okada; Mitsuru Yagi; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.