Literature DB >> 27341291

Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep.

Bradley Lahens1, Rodrigo Neiva2, Nick Tovar1, Adham M Alifarag1, Ryo Jimbo3, Estevam A Bonfante4, Michelle M Bowers1, Marla Cuppini1, Helora Freitas1, Lukasz Witek1, Paulo G Coelho5.   

Abstract

A bone drilling concept, namely osseodensification, has been introduced for the placement of endosteal implants to increase primary stability through densification of the osteotomy walls. This study investigated the effect of osseodensification on the initial stability and early osseointegration of conical and parallel walled endosteal implants in low density bone. Five male sheep were used. Three implants were inserted in the ilium, bilaterally, totaling 30 implants (n=15 conical, and n=15 parallel). Each animal received 3 implants of each type, inserted into bone sites prepared as follows: (i) regular-drilling (R: 2mm pilot, 3.2mm, and 3.8mm twist drills), (ii) clockwise osseodensification (CW), and (iii) counterclockwise (CCW) osseodensification drilling with Densah Bur (Versah, Jackson, MI, USA): 2.0mm pilot, 2.8mm, and 3.8mm multi-fluted burs. Insertion torque as a function of implant type and drilling technique, revealed higher values for osseodensification relative to R-drilling, regardless of implant macrogeometry. A significantly higher bone-to-implant contact (BIC) for both osseodensification techniques (p<0.05) was observed compared to R-drilling. There was no statistical difference in BIC as a function of implant type (p=0.58), nor in bone-area-fraction occupancy (BAFO) as a function of drilling technique (p=0.22), but there were higher levels of BAFO for parallel than conic implants (p=0.001). Six weeks after surgery, new bone formation along with remodeling sites was observed for all groups. Bone chips in proximity with the implants were seldom observed in the R-drilling group, but commonly observed in the CW, and more frequently under the CCW osseodensification technique. In low-density bone, endosteal implants present higher insertion torque levels when placed in osseodensification drilling sites, with no osseointegration impairment compared to standard subtractive drilling methods.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341291     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  14 in total

1.  Bone Micromorphology and Material Attrition After Sonic, Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ashkan Rashad; Stefan Schwan; Alireza Nasirpour; Inge Schmitz; Henning Hanken; Reinhard E Friedrich; Martin Gosau
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Osseodensification -- A systematic review and qualitative analysis of published literature.

Authors:  Ninad Milind Padhye; Ashvini Mukul Padhye; Neel B Bhatavadekar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-02

3.  Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Adham M Alifarag; Andrea Torroni; Nick Tovar; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-01-13

4.  Effects of osseodensification protocol on insertion, removal torques, and resonance frequency analysis of BioHorizons® conical implants. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Felipe Cáceres; Cristian Troncoso; Ramón Silva; Nelson Pinto
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevations using versah burs with simultaneous implant placement, at residual bone height ≥ 2.0 _ < 6.0 mm. A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Jenna Z Alhayati; Auday M Al-Anee
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-14

6.  Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribs.

Authors:  Nishith Bhargava; Vittoria Perrotti; Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio; Victor Haruo Matsubara; Diana Patalwala; Alessandro Quaranta
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, Osseodensification: an in vitro study.

Authors:  J Barberá-Millán; C Larrazábal-Morón; J-J Enciso-Ripoll; E Pérez-Pevida; D Chávarri-Prado; M-D Gómez-Adrián
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2021-05-01

8.  The effect of osseodensification on implant stability and bone density: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Aseel R Hindi; Salwan Y Bede
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 9.  Osseodensification - A novel approach in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Umesh Y Pai; Shobha J Rodrigues; Karishma S Talreja; Mahesh Mundathaje
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

10.  The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Almutairi; Maher Abdullatif Walid; Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.