Literature DB >> 33910827

Bone Micromorphology and Material Attrition After Sonic, Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomies.

Ashkan Rashad1,2, Stefan Schwan3, Alireza Nasirpour4, Inge Schmitz5, Henning Hanken2, Reinhard E Friedrich6, Martin Gosau2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Osteotomy as the first step in surgery, provides access to the field and its application could influence the outcome. Nowadays, the conventional burr reduction is being challenged by newer sonic and ultrasonic methods. We investigated the bone structural integrity and metal attrition residues both in bone and the irrigation fluid.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine ribs were cut using three methods. Bone cuts were studied using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) for tissue discrepancies and Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersion X-Ray Microanalysis (SEM/EDX) for organic and inorganic debris.
RESULTS: Better preservation of bone architecture was seen in piezo and sono surgery while metal attrition was not conclusive (p>0.05). Unlike in bone analyses, both bur and ultrasonic osteotomies showed statistically significant higher median inorganic detection per analysis (p=0.021 and p=0.037, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Sono and piezo surgery proved to be less invasive while attrition properties were the same. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Piezo surgery; conventional surgery; material attrition; micromorphology; osteotomy; sono surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910827      PMCID: PMC8193334          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  26 in total

1.  Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants.

Authors:  M Esposito; J Lausmaa; J M Hirsch; P Thomsen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery.

Authors:  T Vercellotti
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2004-05

3.  Material attrition and bone micromorphology after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation.

Authors:  Ashkan Rashad; Pooyan Sadr-Eshkevari; Markus Weuster; Inge Schmitz; Nora Prochnow; Peter Maurer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 4.  Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  G Pavlíková; R Foltán; M Horká; T Hanzelka; H Borunská; J Sedý
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Assessment of nerve damage using a novel ultrasonic device for bone cutting.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Claude Jaquiéry; Michael Heberer; Markus Tolnay; Tomaso Vercellotti; Ivan Martin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Micromorphometrical analysis of conventional osteotomy techniques and ultrasonic osteotomy at the rabbit skull.

Authors:  Peter Maurer; Marcus S Kriwalsky; Rafael Block Veras; Jürgen Vogel; Frank Syrowatka; Christian Heiss
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Federico Berton; Gianluca Turco; Maurizio Franco; Chiara Ottavia Navarra; Francesca Andolsek; Michele Maglione; Roberto Di Lenarda
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty: infection always should be ruled out.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Dong-Hun Suh; S Mehdi Jafari; Adam Mullan; James J Purtill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Clinical evaluation of split-crest technique with ultrasonic bone surgery for narrow ridge expansion: status of soft and hard tissues and implant success.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Leire Begoña; Gorka Orive
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.932

10.  Ultrasonic surgery--an alternative way in orthognathic surgery of the mandible. A pilot study.

Authors:  R M Gruber; F-J Kramer; H-A Merten; H Schliephake
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.789

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.