Literature DB >> 28113132

Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation.

Christopher D Lopez1, Adham M Alifarag2, Andrea Torroni3, Nick Tovar4, J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso3, Lukasz Witek4, Eduardo D Rodriguez3, Paulo G Coelho5.   

Abstract

Integration between implant and bone is an essential concept for osseous healing requiring hardware placement. A novel approach to hardware implantation, termed osseodensification, is described here as an effective alternative. 12 sheep averaging 65kg had fixation devices installed in their C2, C3, and C4 vertebral bodies; each device measured 4mm diameter×10mm length. The left-sided vertebral body devices were implanted using regular surgical drilling (R) while the right-sided devices were implanted using osseodensification drilling (OD). The C2 and C4 vertebra provided the t=0 in vivo time point, while the C3 vertebra provided the t=3 and t=6 week time points, in vivo. Structural competence of hardware was measured using biomechanical testing of pullout strength, while the quality and degree of new bone formation and remodeling was assessed via histomorphometry. Pullout strength demonstrated osseodensification drilling to provide superior anchoring when compared to the control group collapsed over time with statistical significance (p<0.01). On Wilcoxon rank signed test, C2 and C4 specimens demonstrated significance when comparing device pullout (p=0.031) for both, and C3 pullout tests at 3 and 6 weeks collapsed over time had significance as well (p=0.027). Percent bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) analysis as a function of drilling technique demonstrated an OD group with significantly higher values relative to the R group (p<0.01). Similarly, percent bone-area-fraction-occupancy (BAFO) analysis presented with significantly higher values for the OD group compared to the R group (p=0.024). As a function of time, between 0 and 3 weeks, a decrease in BAFO was observed, a trend that reversed between 3 and 6 weeks, resulting in a BAFO value roughly equivalent to the t=0 percentage, which was attributed to an initial loss of bone fraction due to remodeling, followed by regaining of bone fraction via production of woven bone. Histomorphological data demonstrated autologous bone chips in the OD group with greater frequency relative to the control, which acted as nucleating surfaces promoting new bone formation around the implants, providing superior stability and greater bone density. This alternative approach to a critical component of hardware implantation encourages assessment of current surgical approaches to hardware implantation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28113132      PMCID: PMC5434975          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  45 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of surface chemistry and topologic structure from modified microarc oxidation coatings on Ti implants for improving osseointegration.

Authors:  Rui Zhou; Daqing Wei; Jianyun Cao; Wei Feng; Su Cheng; Qing Du; Baoqiang Li; Yaming Wang; Dechang Jia; Yu Zhou
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 2.  Osseointegration of metallic devices: current trends based on implant hardware design.

Authors:  Paulo G Coelho; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  Hydroxyapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; M Petrén-Mallmin; S Larsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

4.  Surface characterization, biomechanical, and histologic evaluation of alumina and bioactive resorbable blasting textured surfaces in titanium implant healing chambers: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Lukasz Witek; Charles Marin; Rodrigo Granato; Estevam A Bonfante; Felipe E B Campos; Julio Bisinotto Gomes; Marcelo Suzuki; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  A method for histological preparation of undecalcified bone sections containing acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  L N Jensen; J S Jensen; K Gotfredsen
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

7.  Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses.

Authors:  Hendrik Van de Meent; Maria T Hopman; Jan Paul Frölke
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Clinical aspects of osseointegration in joint replacement. A histological study of titanium implants.

Authors:  L Linder; A Carlsson; L Marsal; L M Bjursten; P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-08

9.  Thermal damage during humeral reaming in total shoulder resurfacing.

Authors:  Philip A McCann; Partha P Sarangi; Richard P Baker; Ashley W Blom; Rouin Amirfeyz
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2013-07

10.  Lumbar transpedicular implant failure: a clinical and surgical challenge and its radiological assessment.

Authors:  Mohamed M Mohi Eldin; Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Osseodensification -- A systematic review and qualitative analysis of published literature.

Authors:  Ninad Milind Padhye; Ashvini Mukul Padhye; Neel B Bhatavadekar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-02

2.  Effects of osseodensification protocol on insertion, removal torques, and resonance frequency analysis of BioHorizons® conical implants. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Felipe Cáceres; Cristian Troncoso; Ramón Silva; Nelson Pinto
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-31

3.  The effect of osseodensification on implant stability and bone density: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Aseel R Hindi; Salwan Y Bede
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-05-01

4.  The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Almutairi; Maher Abdullatif Walid; Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Molar Septum Expansion with Osseodensification for Immediate Implant Placement, Retrospective Multicenter Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow-Up, Introducing a New Molar Socket Classification.

Authors:  Samvel Bleyan; João Gaspar; Salah Huwais; Charles Schwimer; Ziv Mazor; José João Mendes; Rodrigo Neiva
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.