Literature DB >> 32995971

Defining critical factors in multi-country studies of assisted reproductive technologies (ART): data from the US and UK health systems.

Michael L Eisenberg1,2, Barbara Luke3, Katherine Cameron4, Gary M Shaw5, Allan A Pacey6, Alastair G Sutcliffe7, Carrie Williams7, Julian Gardiner8, Richard A Anderson9, Valerie L Baker3.   

Abstract

As the worldwide use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) continues to grow, there is a critical need to assess the safety of these treatment parameters and the potential adverse health effects of their use in adults and their offspring. While key elements remain similar across nations, geographic variations both in treatments and populations make generalizability challenging. We describe and compare the demographic factors between the USA and the UK related to ART use and discuss implications for research. The USA and the UK share some common elements of ART practice and in how data are collected regarding long-term outcomes. However, the monitoring of ART in these two countries each brings strengths that complement each other's limitations.

Keywords:  Education; Fertilization in vitro; Infertility; Social class

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32995971      PMCID: PMC7642045          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01951-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  67 in total

1.  Family and neighborhood sources of socioeconomic inequality in children's achievement.

Authors:  Narayan Sastry; Anne R Pebley
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-08

2.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011.

Authors:  G David Adamson; Jacques de Mouzon; Georgina M Chambers; Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Ragaa Mansour; Osamu Ishihara; Manish Banker; Silke Dyer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Widening socioeconomic inequalities in US life expectancy, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Mohammad Siahpush
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples.

Authors:  A T Geronimus; J Bound
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Enigma of maternal race and infant birth weight: a population-based study of US-born Black and Caribbean-born Black women.

Authors:  E K Pallotto; J W Collins; R J David
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  H Bosma; H D van de Mheen; G J Borsboom; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Valerie L Baker; Kevin J Doody; David B Seifer; Logan G Spector
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Male Infertility and Future Cardiometabolic Health: Does the Association Vary by Sociodemographic Factors?

Authors:  Alex M Kasman; Shufeng Li; Barbara Luke; Alastair G Sutcliffe; Allan A Pacey; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.