Literature DB >> 23518031

Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following assisted reproduction.

A Farhi1, B Reichman, V Boyko, A Hourvitz, R Ron-El, L Lerner-Geva.   

Abstract

This study assessed the risk for maternal complications in women and neonatal outcomes in children conceived following assisted reproductive treatment as compared with spontaneously conception and also separately evaluated conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The prospective cohort included 1161 women with singleton pregnancies: 561 who conceived following assisted reproduction (223 following IVF and 338 following ICSI) and 600 who conceived spontaneously. No differences were observed in pregnancy complications (including spontaneous abortion, pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes and Caesarean delivery) except for significantly increased risk for excess vaginal bleeding in assisted reproduction pregnancies (21.4% versus 12.9%; OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.37), which was prominent in women who reported polycystic ovary syndrome. Neonates born following assisted reproduction had increased risk for prematurity (10.6% versus 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.87), and IVF, but not ICSI, was associated with significantly increased risk for prematurity (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.28-4.37) and low birthweight (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.03-3.46). In conclusion, this study observed only an increased risk for excess vaginal bleeding as a pregnancy-associated complication in singleton pregnancies following assisted compared with spontaneous conception. However, singleton neonates born following IVF, but not ICSI, were at increased risk for prematurity.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23518031     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  11 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Does Autism Diagnosis Age or Symptom Severity Differ Among Children According to Whether Assisted Reproductive Technology was Used to Achieve Pregnancy?

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Christine Fountain; Sheree L Boulet; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Dmitry M Kissin; Denise J Jamieson; Catherine Rice; Peter Bearman
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-09

4.  Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julia K Bosdou; Panagiotis Anagnostis; Dimitrios G Goulis; Georgios T Lainas; Basil C Tarlatzis; Grigoris F Grimbizis; Efstratios M Kolibianakis
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Peripartum and postpartum outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancy following ART: a retrospective cohort study from two Italian obstetric units.

Authors:  Silvia Vannuccini; Chiara Ferrata; Federica Perelli; Serena Pinzauti; Filiberto M Severi; Fernando M Reis; Felice Petraglia; Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-07-24

6.  Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Shana Ginar da Silva; Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi; Mariângela Freitas da Silveira; Marlos Rodrigues Domingues; Kelly R Evenson; Iná Silva Dos Santos
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lei; Yong-Lian Lan; Shu-Yu Wang; Wei Feng; Zhi-Jin Zhai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch; Flavia T S Elias; Jessica Pudwell; Laura Gaudet; Mark Walker; Graeme N Smith; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hui Ju Chih; Flavia T S Elias; Laura Gaudet; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Obstetrical outcomes of ART pregnancies in patients with male factor infertility.

Authors:  Isca Landesberg; Anat Lavie; Maya Ram; Michal Yechieli; Lee Reicher; Ariel Many; Sharon Morag; Yonit Schechtman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.