Literature DB >> 27317711

Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope® or C-MAC® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial.

M F Aziz1, E O Bayman2, M M Van Tienderen3, M M Todd2, A M Brambrink3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation using acute-angle videolaryngoscopy achieves high success rates, but is not without difficulty. We aimed to determine predictors of 'difficult videolaryngoscopy'.
METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a data set (n=1100) gathered from a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial of patients for whom difficult direct laryngoscopy was anticipated and who were intubated with one of two videolaryngoscopy devices (GlideScope(®) or C-MAC(®) with D-blade). 'Difficult videolaryngoscopy' was defined as 'first intubation time >60 s' or 'first attempt intubation failure'. A multivariate logistic regression model along with stepwise model selection techniques was performed to determine independent predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy.
RESULTS: Of 1100 patients, 301 were identified as difficult videolaryngoscopies. By univariate analysis, head and neck position, provider, type of surgery, and mouth opening were associated with difficult videolaryngoscopy (P<0.05). According to the multivariate logistic regression model, characteristics associated with greater risk for difficult videolaryngoscopy were as follows: (i) head and neck position of 'supine sniffing' vs 'supine neutral' {odds ratio (OR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.14, 2.31]}; (ii) undergoing otolaryngologic or cardiac surgery vs general surgery (OR 1.89, 95% CI [1.19, 3.01] and OR 6.13, 95% CI [1.85, 20.37], respectively); (iii) intubation performed by an attending anaesthestist vs a supervised resident (OR 1.83, 95% CI [1.14, 2.92]); and (iv) small mouth opening (OR 1.18, 95% CI [1.02, 1.36]).
CONCLUSION: This secondary analysis of an existing data set indicates four covariates associated with difficult acute-angle videolaryngoscopy, of which patient position and provider level are modifiable.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; intratracheal; intubation; laryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317711      PMCID: PMC4913400          DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  21 in total

1.  Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance.

Authors:  Toshiya Shiga; Zen'ichiro Wajima; Tetsuo Inoue; Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients.

Authors:  A Jungbauer; M Schumann; V Brunkhorst; A Börgers; H Groeben
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation.

Authors:  M A Malik; R Subramaniam; C H Maharaj; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index.

Authors:  J Arné; P Descoins; J Fusciardi; P Ingrand; B Ferrier; D Boudigues; J Ariès
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea.

Authors:  F R Altermatt; H R Muñoz; A E Delfino; L I Cortínez
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation.

Authors:  Marshal B Kaplan; Carin A Hagberg; Denham S Ward; Ansgar Brambrink; Ashwani K Chhibber; Thomas Heidegger; Leonardo Lozada; Andranik Ovassapian; David Parsons; James Ramsay; Wolfram Wilhelm; Bernhard Zwissler; Haus J Gerig; Christian Hofstetter; Suzanne Karan; Nevin Kreisler; Robert M Pousman; Andreas Thierbach; Marc Wrobel; George Berci
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients.

Authors:  D A Sun; C B Warriner; D G Parsons; R Klein; H S Umedaly; M Moult
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions.

Authors:  Jeremy S Collins; Harry J M Lemmens; Jay B Brodsky; John G Brock-Utne; Richard M Levitan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.

Authors:  Michael F Aziz; Ron O Abrons; Davide Cattano; Emine O Bayman; David E Swanson; Carin A Hagberg; Michael M Todd; Ansgar M Brambrink
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning for the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  James Ronald Boyce; Timothy Ness; Pablo Castroman; John J Gleysteen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  11 in total

1.  Progress in difficult airway management.

Authors:  Takashi Asai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Evaluation of the correlation between preoperative airway assessment tests, anthropometric measurements, and endotracheal intubation difficulty in obesity class III patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Emre Emik; Funda Gümüs-Özcan; Serdar Demirgan; Aysin Selcan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Thyromental distance ("Patil") revisited : Knowledge and performance of a basic airway screening tool among European anesthetists.

Authors:  H Ilper; A Grossbach; C Franz-Jäger; C Byhahn; M Klages; H H Ackermann; K Zacharowski; T Kunz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hyongmin Oh; Hansol Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Hyung-Chul Lee; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Intubation difficulty scale contributors and time delay in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ting-Wei Kang; Jung-Der Wang; Yi-Seng Tsai; Chung-Ren Lin; Chia-Chih Alex Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Evaluation of the use of the channeled King Vision video laryngoscope in improving glottic visualisation in patients with limited glottic view with the Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaya Choudhary; Arijit Kumar Barai; Sandip Das; Nirjhar Mukherjee
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-12-22

7.  A Decision Tree Approach to Airway Management Pathways in the 2022 Difficult Airway Algorithm of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  William H Rosenblatt; N David Yanez
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; George Kovacs; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Predictors of difficult intubation when using a videolaryngoscope with an intermediate-angled blade during the first attempt: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Hye Rim Kim; So Yeon Kim; Ha Yan Kim; Wyun Kon Park; Min Ho Lee; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.977

10.  Comparison of Laryngoscopic Views betweenC-MAC™ and Conventional Laryngoscopy in Patients with Multiple Preoperative Prognostic Criteria of Difficult Intubation. An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Aikaterini Amaniti; Panagiota Papakonstantinou; Dimitrios Gkinas; Ioannis Dalakakis; Evangelia Papapostolou; Anastasia Nikopoulou; Marianna Tsatali; Paul Zarogoulidis; Konstantinos Sapalidis; Christoforos Kosmidis; Charilaos Koulouris; Dimitrios Giannakidis; Konstantinos Romanidis; Panagoula Oikonomou; Nikolaos Michalopoulos; Aris Ioannidis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Anastasios Vagionas; Isaak Kesisoglou; Vasilios Grosomanidis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.