Literature DB >> 15527629

Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions.

Jeremy S Collins1, Harry J M Lemmens, Jay B Brodsky, John G Brock-Utne, Richard M Levitan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of patient position on the view obtained during laryngoscopy was investigated.
METHODS: 60 morbidly obese patients undergoing elective bariatric were studied. Patients were randomly assigned into one of two groups. In Group 1, a conventional "sniff" position was obtained by placing a firm 7-cm cushion underneath the patient's head, thus raising the occiput a standard distance from the operating-table while the patient remained supine. In Group 2, a "ramped" position was achieved by arranging blankets underneath the patient's upper body and head until horizontal alignment was achieved between the external auditory meatus and the sternal notch. Following induction of general anesthesia, tracheal intubation was performed using a Video MacIntosh laryngoscope. The laryngoscopy and intubation sequences were recorded onto videotape. Three independent investigators, unaware as to which position the patient had been in at the time of tracheal intubation, then viewed the videotape and assigned a numerical grade to the best laryngeal view obtained.
RESULTS: The "ramped" position improved the laryngeal view when compared to a standard "sniff" position, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.037).
CONCLUSION: The "ramped" position is superior to the standard "sniff" position for direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527629     DOI: 10.1381/0960892042386869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  57 in total

1.  A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Park; Hee-Pyoung Park; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Jin-Hee Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  The factors affecting success rate of emergency intubation: author’s reply.

Authors:  James Matthew Dargin; Lillian Liang Emlet; Francis Xavier Guyette
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  David R Janz; Matthew W Semler; Robert J Lentz; Daniel T Matthews; Tufik R Assad; Brett C Norman; Raj D Keriwala; Benjamin A Ferrell; Michael J Noto; Ciara M Shaver; Bradley W Richmond; Jeannette Zinggeler Berg; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  JSA airway management guideline 2014: to improve the safety of induction of anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  A Thorell; A D MacCormick; S Awad; N Reynolds; D Roulin; N Demartines; M Vignaud; A Alvarez; P M Singh; D N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Emergency Neurological Life Support: Airway, Ventilation, and Sedation.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Becky Riggs; David B Seder
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Effect of head elevation on passive upper airway collapsibility in normal subjects during propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Masato Kobayashi; Takao Ayuse; Yuko Hoshino; Shinji Kurata; Shunji Moromugi; Hartmut Schneider; Jason P Kirkness; Alan R Schwartz; Kumiko Oi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; David R Janz; Derek W Russell; Jonathan D Casey; Robert J Lentz; Aline N Zouk; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Jairo I Santanilla; Yasin A Khan; Aaron M Joffe; William S Stigler; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Chest anteroposterior diameter affects difficulty of laryngoscopy for non-morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Ji-Won Choi; Jie-Ae Kim; Hae-Kyoung Kim; Min-Seok Oh; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Anesthetic considerations for abdominal wall reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Slabach; Johan P Suyderhoud
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.