Literature DB >> 34251587

Predictors of difficult intubation when using a videolaryngoscope with an intermediate-angled blade during the first attempt: a prospective observational study.

Hye Jin Kim1, Hye Rim Kim2, So Yeon Kim1, Ha Yan Kim2, Wyun Kon Park1, Min Ho Lee1, Hyun Joo Kim3.   

Abstract

The curvature of a videolaryngoscope blade has been diversified from the standard macintosh-type to the hyperacute-angle-type, resulting in different performances. We aimed to determine the intubation success rate and identify predictors of difficult intubation when using an intermediate-angled videolaryngoscope in the first attempt of intubation under routine anaesthesia settings. We enrolled 808 patients between 19 and 79 years of age, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation from July 2017 to November 2018; patients who were candidates for awake intubation were excluded. We obtained patient demographic data and performed airway evaluation before induction of anaesthesia for elective surgeries. We used the UEScope for tracheal intubation with a hockey stick-shaped malleable stylet. The intubation time was defined as the total duration from the entry of the blade into the oropharynx to the detection of first end-tidal carbon dioxide capnogram; this duration was recorded along with the number of intubation attempts. Difficult intubation was defined as either > 60 s duration for tracheal intubation, or > 1 intubation attempt. The use of the UEScope demonstrated a 99.4% success rate for intubation; however, increased difficulties were observed in patients who were male, obese, had a short thyromental distance, limited mouth opening, and high upper-lip-bite test class. Despite the high intubation success rate using an intermediate-angled videolaryngoscope, we recommend preparing backup plans, considering the increased difficulty in patients with certain preoperative features.Clinical trial number and registry URL: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT03215823 (Date of registration: 12 July).
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway assessment; Predictor difficult intubation; Time factors; Videolaryngoscope

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34251587     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00742-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  34 in total

1.  Is GlideScope the best way to intubate?

Authors:  Deepak Sharma
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation.

Authors:  Erol Cavus; Joerg Kieckhaefer; Volker Doerges; Thora Moeller; Carsten Thee; Klaus Wagner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Videolaryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy.

Authors:  A van Zundert; B Pieters; V Doerges; S Gatt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care.

Authors:  C Zaouter; J Calderon; T M Hemmerling
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Kleine-Brueggeney; R Greif; P Schoettker; G L Savoldelli; S Nabecker; L G Theiler
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia.

Authors:  T M Cook; N Woodall; C Frerk
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  S R Lewis; A R Butler; J Parker; T M Cook; O J Schofield-Robinson; A F Smith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Current Evidences for the Use of UEscope in Airway Management.

Authors:  Fu-Shan Xue; Ben-Quan Yang; Ya-Yang Liu; Hui-Xian Li; Gui-Zhen Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  A systematic review of meta-analyses comparing direct laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew W Downey; Laura V Duggan; J Adam Law
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 10.  A review of video laryngoscopes relevant to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dharshi Karalapillai; Jai Darvall; Justin Mandeville; Louise Ellard; Jon Graham; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.