Literature DB >> 29392357

Thyromental distance ("Patil") revisited : Knowledge and performance of a basic airway screening tool among European anesthetists.

H Ilper1,2, A Grossbach3, C Franz-Jäger4, C Byhahn5, M Klages4, H H Ackermann6, K Zacharowski4, T Kunz4.   

Abstract

Predicting and managing the difficult airway is a lifesaving and vital basic task for the anesthetist. Current guidelines of all important societies include thyromental distance (TMD, "Patil") as a possible predictor for a difficult airway and includes two important aspects for airway management: the mandibular space and the flexibility of the cervical spine. We evaluated knowledge and execution regarding TMD for predicting a difficult airway on participants at the Euroanaesthesia (ESA) congress and German Anaesthesia Congress (DAC) in 2014. Our evaluation consisted of a theoretical part with questions regarding general knowledge and a practical evaluation with anesthetists performing on a human airway model. Practical evaluations were performed separately from other participants. During the DAC 245 (ESA 230) physicians participated, of which 64% were male (ESA 58%). At the DAC 182 (74.3%) and ESA 82 (35.6%) participants knew about Patil/TMD. Its use as a predictive score for a difficult airway was known by 122 (49.8%; DAC) and 79 (34.4%; ESA) participants. The correct definition for intubation was given by 45 (25.7%) at the DAC and 56 (24.3%) at ESA. Only 40-41% of the participants measured the correct distance for TMD. Only 6.1-6.5% completed both the theoretical and practical parts correctly. As non-invasive TMD includes two different aspects of patient airways and is part of current guidelines, education and training must be extended to assure adequate evaluation in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway; Difficult laryngoscopy; Guidelines; Noninvasive predictor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29392357     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-018-0412-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  28 in total

1.  Accurate classification of difficult intubation by computerized facial analysis.

Authors:  Christopher W Connor; Scott Segal
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: an assessment of the thyromental distance and Mallampati predictive tests.

Authors:  P J Butler; S S Dhara
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.669

3.  Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance.

Authors:  Toshiya Shiga; Zen'ichiro Wajima; Tetsuo Inoue; Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].

Authors:  K Ruetzler; S Imach; M Weiss; T Haas; A R Schmidt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Major incidents and complications in otherwise healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: results based on 1.37 million anaesthetic procedures.

Authors:  J H Schiff; A Welker; B Fohr; A Henn-Beilharz; U Bothner; H Van Aken; A Schleppers; H J Baldering; W Heinrichs
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index.

Authors:  J Arné; P Descoins; J Fusciardi; P Ingrand; B Ferrier; D Boudigues; J Ariès
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway.

Authors:  T Saito; S T H Chew; W L Liu; K K Thinn; T Asai; L K Ti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Limitations of videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  A Norris; T Heidegger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Prediction in airway management: what is worthwhile, what is a waste of time and what about the future?

Authors:  W H Teoh; M S Kristensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Litigation related to airway and respiratory complications of anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007.

Authors:  T M Cook; S Scott; R Mihai
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Update Mallampati : Theoretical and practical knowledge of European anesthetists on basic evaluation of airways].

Authors:  H Ilper; C Franz-Jäger; C Byhahn; M Klages; H H Ackermann; K Zacharowski; T Kunz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.