Literature DB >> 27306660

Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy in the diagnosis and management of suspicious microcalcifications.

Gül Esen1, Burçin Tutar, Cihan Uras, Zerrin Calay, Ümit İnce, Onur Tutar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to present our biopsy method and retrospectively evaluate the results, upgrade rate, and follow-up findings of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) procedures performed in our clinic.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-four patients with mammographically detected nonpalpable breast lesions underwent VABB using a 9 gauge biopsy probe and prone biopsy table. A total of 195 patients (median age 53 years, range 32-80 years) with 198 microcalcification-only lesions with a follow-up of at least one year were included in the study. The location of the lesion relative to the needle was determined from the postfire images, and unlike the conventional technique, tissue retrieval was predominantly performed from that location, followed by a complete 360° rotation, if needed.
RESULTS: The median core number was 8.5. Biopsy results revealed 135 benign, 24 atypical, and 39 malignant lesions. The total upgrade rate at surgery was 7.7% (6.1% for ductal carcinomas in situ and 10.5% for atypical lesions). Patients with benign lesions were followed up for a median period of 27.5 months, with no interval change. At the follow-up, scar formation was seen in 23 patients (17%); three of the scars were remarkable for resembling a malignancy.
CONCLUSION: Our biposy method is fast and practical, and it is easily tolerated by patients without compromising accuracy. Patients with a diagnosis of atypia still need to undergo a diagnostic surgical procedure and those with a malignancy need to undergo curative surgery, even if the lesion is totally excised at biopsy. VABB may leave a scar in the breast tissue, which may resemble a malignancy, albeit rarely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306660      PMCID: PMC4956017          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2015.14522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  35 in total

1.  Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.

Authors:  M J Bagnall; A J Evans; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; H Denley; J G Geraghty; I O Ellis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kohr; Peter R Eby; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B DeMartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  L Liberman; T L Feng; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device.

Authors:  H E Reynolds; C M Poon; R J Goulet; C L Lazaridis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Breast microcalcification: diagnostic value of calcified and non-calcified cores on specimen radiographs.

Authors:  Hatice Gümüş; Pippa Mills; David Fish; Metehan Gümüş; Haresh Devalia; Sue E Jones; Ali R Sever
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious clustered microcalcifications: could patients without residual microcalcifications be managed conservatively?

Authors:  Alessandro Villa; Alberto Tagliafico; Fabio Chiesa; Maurizio Chiaramondia; Daniele Friedman; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcification-only lesions using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Hatice Gümüş; Metehan Gümüş; Haresh Devalia; Philippa Mills; David Fish; Peter Jones; Aşur Uyar; Ali Sever
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  J E Meyer; D N Smith; S C Lester; C Kaelin; P J DiPiro; C M Denison; R L Christian; S C Harvey; D L Selland; S M Durfee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  When is a diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable at core biopsy?

Authors:  Harmindar K Gill; Olga B Ioffe; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman; J H Smolkin; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson; P P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

1.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Value of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in non-palpable suspicious calcifications: an eight-year single institution experience with 587 patients.

Authors:  Shiping Li; Feilin Qu; Yinlong Yang; Lei Wang; Juping Shen; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

3.  Impact of Non-Calcified Specimen Pathology on the Underestimation of Malignancy for the Incomplete Retrieval of Suspicious Calcifications Diagnosed as Flat Epithelial Atypia or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia by Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Chi Chang Yu; Yun Chung Cheung; Shir Hwa Ueng; Shin Cheh Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Juntao Li; Hengwei Zhang; Hui Jiang; Xuhui Guo; Yinli Zhang; Dan Qi; Jitian Guan; Zhenzhen Liu; Erxi Wu; Suxia Luo
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 7.271

5.  Contrast ultrasound versus ultrasound elastography for diagnosis of breast lumps: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Kaituo Yan; Yingying Liu; Zaibin Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy System: No Innovation Without Evaluation.

Authors:  Sherif Monib; Soumitra Mukerji; Sonia Narula
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy of ultrasound occult lesions.

Authors:  Suhaila Bohan; Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid; Wai Yee Chan; Anushya Vijayananthan; Norlisah Ramli; Shaleen Kaur; Kartini Rahmat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does lateral arm technique decrease the rate of clip migration in stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies?

Authors:  Olena Weaver; Ethan O Cohen; Rachel E Perry; Hilda H Tso; Kanchan Phalak; Ashmitha Srinivasan; Roland Bassett; Jessica W T Leung
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 9.  Breast microcalcifications: Past, present and future (Review).

Authors:  Angela F Logullo; Karla C K Prigenzi; Cristiane C B A Nimir; Andreia F V Franco; Mario S D A Campos
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10

10.  Image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Linping Huang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.