Literature DB >> 9646821

Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

L Liberman1, J H Smolkin, D D Dershaw, E A Morris, A F Abramson, P P Rosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the frequencies of calcification retrieval and histologic underestimates at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of records revealed 112 calcific lesions in 80 women (aged 31-85 years) who underwent stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy; a mean of 14 specimens per lesion were obtained. Calcification retrieval was defined as identification of calcifications on radiographs of specimens. Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) underestimates were lesions that yielded ADH at stereotactic biopsy and carcinoma at surgery. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimates were lesions that yielded DCIS at stereotactic biopsy and infiltrating carcinoma at surgery. Mammograms, stereotactic images, radiographs of specimens, and histologic findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy removed all calcifications in 51 (46%) lesions, some calcifications in 55 (49%) lesions, and no calcifications in six (5%) lesions. Failure to retrieve calcifications was significantly more likely in lesions 5 mm or smaller (12% [five of 43] vs 1% [one of 69], P = .03), in calcifications with amorphous morphology (21% [three of 14] vs 3% [three of 98], P < .03), or if the probe was fired outside the breast (12% [five of 40] vs 1% [one of 72], P = .02). Surgery revealed DCIS in one (10%) of 10 lesions that yielded ADH at stereotactic biopsy. Surgery revealed infiltrating carcinoma in one (5%) of 21 lesions that yielded DCIS at stereotactic biopsy. No underestimation occurred when all calcifications were removed.
CONCLUSION: Stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy resulted in successful calcification retrieval in 106 (95%) of 112 cases. Histologic underestimation was infrequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9646821     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; W Matzek; M H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mammotome: less invasive than ABBI with similar accuracy for early breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Walter P Weber; Rosanna Zanetti; Igor Langer; Sophie Dellas; Markus Zuber; Holger Moch; Eugenia Remmel; Daniel Oertli; Edward Wight; Walter R Marti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Ji Young Lee; Ji Hyun Youk; Byeong-Woo Park; Seung-Il Kim; Haeryoung Kim; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Can galactography-guided stereotactic, 11-gauge, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of intraductal lesions serve as an alternative to surgical biopsy?

Authors:  Caecilia S Reiner; Thomas H Helbich; Margaretha Rudas; Lothar Ponhold; Christopher C Riedl; Nina Kropf; Michael H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Minimally Invasive Biopsy Methods - Diagnostics or Therapy? Personal Opinion and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Factors associated with upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy using imaging guidance.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Pachara Patanajareet; Bussanee Wibulpholprasert; Panuwat Lertsithichai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Y J Suh; M J Kim; E-K Kim; H J Moon; J Y Kwak; H R Koo; J H Yoon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Values of pathological analysis of lost tissue fragments in the vacuum canister during a vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  M El Khoury; B Mesurolle; A Omeroglu; A Aldis; E Kao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Randomized controlled trial of stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for the diagnosis and management of mammographic microcalcification.

Authors:  Sara M Bundred; Anthony J Maxwell; Julie Morris; Yit Y Lim; Md Janick Harake; Sigrid Whiteside; Nigel J Bundred
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The accuracy of frozen section analysis in ultrasound- guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions.

Authors:  Andreas H Brunner; Thomas Sagmeister; Jolanta Kremer; Paul Riss; Hermann Brustmann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.