| Literature DB >> 27300323 |
Devin B Holman1, Xiying Hao1, Edward Topp2, Hee Eun Yang1, Trevor W Alexander1.
Abstract
Agricultural operations generate large quantities of manure which must be eliminated in a manner that is consistent with public health guidelines. Meanwhile, construction and demolition waste makes up about 25% of total solid municipal waste. Co-composting of manure with construction andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27300323 PMCID: PMC4907429 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The 10 most relatively abundant bacterial genera in the each compost mixture type at each sampling time and sampling depth (n = 3).
16S rRNA gene sequence richness and diversity of composted cattle manure by time and sampling depth.
| Treatment | Time (day) | Depth | Number of OTUs | Shannon | Chao1 | PD Whole Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | Top | 2808 ±185a | 6.31 ±0.08 | 4699 ±369a | 185.7 ±2.2a |
| DDG | 0 | Top | 2544 ±208ab | 6.13 ±0.33 | 4483 ±432abc | 180.2 ±14.3a |
| CON C&D | 0 | Top | 2645 ±176ab | 6.27 ±0.08 | 4505 ±473ab | 184.9 ±7.5a |
| CON | 14 | Top | 2471 ±282ab | 6.08 ±0.47 | 4351 ±376abc | 174.4 ±18.9ab |
| CON | 14 | Middle | 2757 ±58a | 6.25 ±0.02 | 4844 ±134a | 181.9 ±0.9a |
| DDG | 14 | Top | 2473 ±140ab | 5.88 ±0.32 | 4619 ±237a | 174.6 ±12.1ab |
| DDG | 14 | Middle | 2455 ±456abc | 5.93 ±0.76 | 4468 ±658abc | 169.4 ±22.8ab |
| CON C&D | 14 | Top | 2150 ±219abc | 5.88 ±0.36 | 3844 ±126abcd | 158.1 ±17.1ab |
| CON C&D | 14 | Middle | 2594 ±262ab | 6.04 ±0.28 | 4643 ±473ab | 183.6 ±13.6a |
| CON | 99 | Top | 1981 ±201abc | 5.82 ±0.43 | 3486 ±63abcd | 156 ±16.1ab |
| CON | 99 | Middle | 1768 ±148bc | 5.09 ±0.09 | 3468 ±152abcd | 137.4 ±11.8ab |
| DDG | 99 | Top | 1788 ±143bc | 5.74 ±0.16 | 3010 ±240abcd | 148.3 ±9.3ab |
| DDG | 99 | Middle | 1750 ±327bc | 4.77 ±0.77 | 3399 ±521cd | 139.2 ±17.8ab |
| CON C&D | 99 | Top | 1689 ±169bc | 5.48 ±0.29 | 3139 ±208bcd | 136.5 ±10.3ab |
| CON C&D | 99 | Middle | 1538 ±12c | 5.08 ±0.01 | 2792 ±137d | 119.8 ±4.6b |
a CON, manure from cattle on a control diet of barley; DDG, manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles; CON C&D, manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) is shown for compost. Means with different lowercase letters are significantly different from one another (P<0.05).
b Samples were taken at the top (7 cm) and middle (90 cm) of each compost bin.
Fig 2Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots of the weighted UniFrac distances for the archaeal and bacterial microbiota of each A) compost mixture type x sampling time, B) sampling time, and C) sampling depth (day 0 sample excluded).
CON = composted manure from cattle on a control diet of barley, DDG = composted manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles, and CON C&D = composted manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste.
Fig 3Differentially abundant archaeal and bacterial taxa as assessed using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with effect size measurements (LEfSe).
In A) genera enriched in one of the three compost mixture types, B) phyla, and C) genera enriched at one of the three sampling times. For A) only genera with a LDA score greater than 3.0 are displayed, and in B) and C) only those taxa with a LDA score greater than 3.5. CON = composted manure from cattle on a control diet of barley, DDG = composted manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles, and CON C&D = composted manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste.
The 15 most relatively abundant fungal genera detected throughout the composting of cattle manure.
| Phylum | Family | Genus | Species | % Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 14 | Day 99 | ||||
| 26.88 | 6.62 | 2.96 | ||||
| 2.88 | 11.23 | 0.81 | ||||
| multiple | 1.56 | 2.81 | 1.31 | |||
| 0.14 | 0.08 | 3.90 | ||||
| 0.25 | 0.02 | 3.07 | ||||
| multiple | 0.13 | 1.06 | 1.17 | |||
| 0.06 | 0.41 | 1.88 | ||||
| multiple | 0.21 | 0.49 | 1.63 | |||
| 1.88 | 0.22 | 0.14 | ||||
| multiple | 0.26 | 0.77 | 0.68 | |||
| 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.10 | ||||
| 0.88 | 0.33 | 0.05 | ||||
| multiple | 0.28 | 0.68 | 0.18 | |||
| 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.59 | ||||
Fungal sequences were classified using the UNITE database. Species names are included for genera with two or less species detected. Percentage values are represented across all compost mixtures types.
Fungal ITS sequence richness and diversity of composted cattle manure according to time and sampling depth.
| Treatment | Time | Depth | Number of OTUs | Shannon | Chao1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | Top | 142 ± 30b | 2.28 ± 0.67 | 272 ± 90 |
| CON C&D | 0 | Top | 250 ± 57a | 3.46 ± 0.88 | 425 ± 103 |
| CON | 14 | Middle | 237 ± 17ab | 3.54 ± 0.16 | 379 ± 36 |
| CON C&D | 14 | Middle | 209 ± 34ab | 3.06 ± 0.49 | 338 ± 50 |
| CON | 99 | Middle | 182 ± 40ab | 2.79 ± 0.7 | 329 ± 58 |
| CON C&D | 99 | Middle | 166 ± 10ab | 3.31 ± 0.23 | 283 ± 28 |
a CON, manure from cattle on a control diet of barley; DDG, manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles; CON C&D, manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) is shown for compost. Means with different lowercase letters are significantly different from one another (P<0.05).
b Samples were taken at the top (7 cm) and middle (90 cm) of each compost bin.
Fig 4Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots of the Bray-Curtis distances for the fungal microbiota for A) both compost mixture types (day 0 excluded) and B) each sampling time.
CON = composted manure from cattle on a control diet of barley and CON C&D = composted manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste.
Fig 5Concentrations of A) erm(A), B) erm(B), C) erm(F), D) erm(X), E) sul1, and F) sul2, by sampling time and depth.
Error bars represent ± standard deviation of the mean (n = 9). All compost mixture types were combined for analysis as concentrations of each resistance determinants did not differ by compost mixture type at any one sampling time or depth (P > 0.05).
Fig 6Concentrations of A) tet(B), B) tet(C), C) tet(H), D) tet(L), E) tet(M), and F) tet(W), by sampling time and depth.
Error bars represent ± standard deviation of the mean (n = 9). All compost mixture types were combined for analysis as concentrations of each resistance determinants did not differ by compost mixture type at any one sampling time or depth (P > 0.05).
Log10 reductions in the concentration (copies g-1 compost dry weight) of 12 different antimicrobial resistance determinants from day 0 to day 99 in composted manure from cattle.
| Resistance determinant | CON | DDG | CON C&D |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1.51 ± 0.37 | -1.28 ± 0.51 | -1.17 ± 1.28 | |
| -1.71 ± 0.52 | -1.66 ± 0.31 | -1.50 ± 0.57 | |
| -0.92 ± 1.38 | -0.28 ± 1.01 | -1.46 ± 0.87 | |
| -1.00 ± 0.42 | -0.46 ± 0.4 | -0.42 ± 0.64 | |
| -2.79 ± 0.62 | -1.86 ± 0.45 | -2.53 ± 1.46 | |
| -0.97 ± 0.38 | -0.61 ± 0.29 | -0.88 ± 0.82 | |
| -1.55 ± 0.41 | -1.52 ± 0.30 | -1.87 ± 0.96 | |
| -0.66 ± 0.74 | -0.88 ± 0.43 | -1.47 ± 1.01 | |
| -1.37 ± 1.00 | -1.62 ± 0.47 | -2.41 ± 0.81 |
CON, manure from cattle on a control diet of barley; DDG, manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles; CON C&D, manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 6) with top and middle depths combined for analysis. Means with different lowercase letters and in bold in rows are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05).