| Literature DB >> 35346385 |
Martina Kracmarova1, Ondrej Uhlik2, Michal Strejcek2, Jirina Szakova3, Jindrich Cerny3, Jiri Balik3, Pavel Tlustos3, Petr Kohout4,5, Katerina Demnerova2, Hana Stiborova6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although fertilization and crop rotation practices are commonly used worldwide in agriculture to maximize crop yields, their long-term effect on the structures of soil microorganisms is still poorly understood. This study investigated the long-term impact of fertilization and crop rotation on soil microbial diversity and the microbial community structure in four different locations with three soil types. Since 1996, manure (MF; 330 kg N/ha), sewage sludge (SF; 330 and SF3x; 990 kg N/ha), and NPK (NPK; 330 kg N/ha) fertilizers were periodically applied to the soils classified as chernozem, luvisol and cambisol, which are among the most abundant or fertile soils used for agricultural purposes in the world. In these soils, potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were rotated every three years.Entities:
Keywords: Cambisol; Chernozem; Community structure; Luvisol; Manure; Microbial diversity; NPK fertilizers; Sewage sludge
Year: 2022 PMID: 35346385 PMCID: PMC8962459 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-022-00406-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Microbiome ISSN: 2524-6372
Descriptions of experimental fields established in the Czech Republic in 1996
| Location name | Hnevceves | Humpolec | Lukavec | Prague-Suchdol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPS | 50°18′46″N, 15°43′3″E | 49°33′16″N, 15°21′2″E | 49°33′23″N, 14°58′39″E | 50°7′40″N, 14°22′33″E |
| Elevation (m) | 265 | 525 | 610 | 286 |
| Average annual temperature (°C) | 8.2 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 9.1 |
| Average annual rainfall (mm) | 573 | 665 | 666 | 495 |
| CEC (mmol(+)/kg) | 116 | 90 | 45 | 262 |
| Cox (%) | 0.93 | 1.24 | 1.09 | 1.76 |
| pH | 6.45 ± 0.5 | 5.27 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 |
| Bulk density (g/cm3) | 1.50 | 1.40 | 1.27 | 1.43 |
| Clay (%) | 4.36 | 5.84 | 3.21 | 2.18 |
| Silt (%) | 76.98 | 43.55 | 37.06 | 71.8 |
| Sand (%) | 18.66 | 50.61 | 59.73 | 26.03 |
| Soil type (WRB 2006) | Luvisol | Cambisol | Cambisol | Chernozem |
| NRCS USDA | Sandy loam | Silty loam | Sandy loam | Silty loam |
CEC, Cation exchange capacity; NRCS, natural resources conservation service
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of experimental design. In practice, each location had 15 sub-plots (60 m2) with various spatial distribution of the sub-plots. Each sub-plot also included a protection area to prevent fertiliser spreading to other sub-fileds
Fig. 2Shannon and Simpson diversity indices calculated from prokaryotic (a) and fungal (b) sequence data according to different fertilization and crop rotation treatments; (fertilizer): control (CF), cow manure (MF, 330 kg N/ha), NPK (NPK, 330–90-330 kg/ha), sewage sludge (SF, 330 kg N/ha), sewage sludge (SF3x, 990 kg N/ha); (crop): Section A (after potato), Section B (wheat), Section C (after barley)
Fig. 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination (stress = 0.084) of samples based on composition of soil prokaryotic community (ASVs). Samples are coded by the location (color) and soil type (symbols) they originated from. Arrows represent soil chemical parameters that significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with the ordination configuration
Fig. 4Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination (stress = 0.095) of samples based on composition of soil fungal community (ASVs). Samples are coded by the location (color) and soil type (symbols) they originated from. Arrows represent soil chemical parameters that significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with the ordination configuration
Fig. 5Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordinations based on Bray–Curtis distance. Subfigures represents: a prokaryotic and fungal community structure in soils collected from different fertilization regimes: control (CF), manure (MF; 330 kg N/ha), NPK (NPK; 330–90-330 kg/ha), sewage sludge (SF; 330 kg N/ha), sewage sludge (SF3x; 990 kg N/ha); b prokaryotic and fungal community structure in soils after different crop rotation: Section A (samples were collected after potato harvesting), Section B (samples were collected from field vegetated with wheat), Section C (samples were collected after barley harvesting)
Indicator microorganisms for one or more types of fertilization regimes: control (CF), cow manure (MF, 330 kg N/ha), NPK (NPK, 330–90–330 kg/ha), sewage sludge (SF, 330 kg N/ha), sewage sludge (SF3x, 990 kg N/ha)
| Fertilization | Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | Bacteria | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Bacillales | ||
| Bacteria | Firmicutes | Clostridia | Halanaerobiales | |||
| Bacteria | Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | |||
| Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Sphingomonadales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | |||
| SF | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Xanthomonadales | ||
| Bacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | |||
| Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | |||
| SF, SF3x | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Xanthomonadales | ||
| Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhizobiales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | |||
| Fungi | Basidiomycota | Microbotryomycetes | Leucosporidiales | |||
| MF, SF, SF3x | Bacteria | Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | ||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | |||
| MF, SF, SF3x, NPK | Fungi | Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Pezizales |
Indicator microorganisms for different phases of crop rotation
| Crop rotation | Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section A (after potatoes) | Fungi | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | ||
| Fungi | Zoopagomycota | Zoopagomycetes | Zoopagales | |||
| Fungi | Glomeromycota | Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | |||
| Section B (wheat) | Fungi | Ascomycota | Leotiomycetes | Erysiphales | ||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Capnodiales | |||
| Fungi | Basidiomycota | Tremellomycetes | Filobasidiales | |||
| Section C (after barley) | Fungi | Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | ||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Magnaporthales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | |||
| Fungi | Ascomycota | Leotiomycetes | Helotiales |
In each of the three sections of experimental fields, potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were rotated in that order every 3 years, but the sections differed in the currently grown crop: (1) Section A (samples were collected after potato harvesting), (2) Section B (samples were collected from field vegetated with wheat), (3) Section C (samples were collected after barley harvesting)