| Literature DB >> 34956145 |
Zoe Black1,2,3, Igori Balta2,4, Lisa Black1, Patrick J Naughton3, James S G Dooley3, Nicolae Corcionivoschi2,4.
Abstract
The aim of this review was to provide an update on the complex relationship between manure application, altered pathogen levels and antibiotic resistance. This is necessary to protect health and improve the sustainability of this major farming practice in agricultural systems based on high levels of manure production. It is important to consider soil health in relation to environment and land management practices in the context of the soil microflora and the introduction of pathogens on the health of the soil microbiome. Viable pathogens in manure spread on agricultural land may be distributed by leaching, surface run-off, water source contamination and contaminated crop removal. Thus it is important to understand how multiple pathogens can persist in manures and on soil at farm-scale and how crops produced under these conditions could be a potential transfer route for zoonotic pathogens. The management of pathogen load within livestock manure is a potential mechanism for the reduction and prevention of outbreaks infection with Escherichia coli, Listeria Salmonella, and Campylobacter. The ability of Campylobacter, E. coli, Listeria and Salmonella to combat environmental stress coupled with their survival on food crops and vegetables post-harvest emphasizes the need for further study of these pathogens along with the emerging pathogen Providencia given its link to disease in the immunocompromised and its' high levels of antibiotic resistance. The management of pathogen load within livestock manure has been widely recognized as a potential mechanism for the reduction and prevention of outbreaks infection but any studies undertaken should be considered as region specific due to the variable nature of the factors influencing pathogen content and survival in manures and soil. Mediocre soils that require nutrients could be one template for research on manure inputs and their influence on soil health and on pathogen survival on grassland and in food crops.Entities:
Keywords: agriculture; bacterial pathogens; manure; pathogen persistence; soil; zoonotic pathogens
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956145 PMCID: PMC8702830 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.781357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Examples of the impact of common agricultural practices on soil health.
| Common practices | Example of impact on soil health / fertility | References |
| Monoculture cropping Over grazing Tillage | Reduced and/or altered biological diversity | |
| Reduced organic carbon content | ||
| Soil nutrient depletion | ||
| Decreased pH levels | ||
| Soil structural change | ||
| Addition of artificial fertilizer Addition of manure | Altered nutrient availability | |
| Altered pH levels (e.g., soil acidification by added N) | ||
| Altered biological diversity | ||
| Soil structural change |
Background information for examples of zoonotic pathogens which occur in manure (CFU, Colony Forming Units; VNBC, Viable but non-culturable; STEC, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli).
| Pathogen | Characteristics | Infective dose CFU | Common agricultural settings | Common pathogenic species | Examples of survival responses to environmental stresses | References |
|
| Helical microaerophilic, Gram-negative | 500–800 | Poultry, cattle, pigs, waterbodies |
| Biofilm formation VBNC bacterial co-habitation Attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces through biofilm formation Drug resistance Host invasion | |
|
| Rod shaped, facultative anaerobe, Gram-negative. | Extremely low e.g., 10 CFU | Cattle, pigs and sheep, soil, water bodies | STECs e.g., O157 | ||
| Rod shaped, facultative anaerobe, Gram-negative. | Debated, comparatively higher than that of | Pigs, cattle, soil, water bodies |
| |||
| Rod shaped, facultative anaerobe, Gram-negative. | Suggested to be high | Soil, water, livestock intestines |
| Multi-drug resistance Biofilm formation |
Studies of manure pathogen load survival in agricultural soil.
| Sample type | Study location | Detection method | Pathogen | Manure treatment | Maximum survival (days) | References |
| Inoculated dairy slurry (7% dry matter) | Field study—Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom. | Selective agar plating following selective enrichment culturing method | On farm storage | 32 185 32 |
| |
| Inoculated dairy slurry (2% dry matter) | 93 93 185 32 | |||||
| Cattle manure added to sterile soil | Laboratory, America. | Direct plating method of selective agar plaiting of soil suspensions. | Incubation 21°C 5°C | 231 77 |
| |
| Chicken manure applied to non-sterile soils | Laboratory, China., | Direct plating method of selective agar plaiting of soil suspensions. | Incubation 25°C | 2.57 ± 6.57 (reduction from 106 to < 100 CFU g–1) |
| |
| Pig manure applied to non-sterile soils | 25.65 ± 7.12 (reduction from 106 to < 100 CFU g–1) | |||||
| Pig manure | Laboratory, Denmark. | Direct plating method of selective agar plaiting of soil suspensions, qPCR, RT-qPCR |
| Incubation 4°C 15°C 22°C | 24 7 6 |
|
| Manure amended soils | – | – | Up to 332 |
|