Literature DB >> 2729681

Structural stiffness of the Hoffmann simple anterior tibial external fixation frame.

J Vossoughi1, Y Youm, M Bosse, A R Burgess, A Poka.   

Abstract

Tibial external fixation frames were constructed on aluminum tube simulating tibia bone. A 20-mm gap was left at the fracture site in order to measure the structural stiffness of the frame rather than the aluminum tube. The performance of the frames were experimentally evaluated and quantified using tests which simulated the loading conditions encountered in normal walking. These included axial compression, anteroposterior (AP) bending, lateral bending and torsional loading of the frame. The parameters studied were (a) number of fixation pins, (b) number of connecting rods and (c) location of clamps on the pins. Four constants were evaluated from these tests using various structural configurations of the frames; these resulted in four stiffness coefficients in compression, AP bending, lateral bending and torsion. Stiffnesses of various frames with different geometric configurations were compared by comparing their appropriate stiffness coefficients. Such comparison can set forth a quantitative guideline in selecting a suitable frame configuration for the type of injury and condition of fracture pattern. This type of quantitative analysis can also be useful in modifying the frame during the postoperative bone healing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2729681     DOI: 10.1007/bf02368023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  11 in total

1.  Stability of ten configurations of the Hoffmann external-fixation frame.

Authors:  J B Finlay; T K Moroz; C H Rorabeck; J R Davey; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Guidelines for external fixation frame rigidity and stresses.

Authors:  R Huiskes; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Comparison of mechanical performance in four types of external fixators.

Authors:  M T McCoy; E Y Chao; R A Kasman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The deformation of external fixation devices during loading.

Authors:  E O Karaharju; K Aalto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics.

Authors:  J J Wu; H S Shyr; E Y Chao; P J Kelly
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The mechanical performance of the standard Hoffmann-Vidal external fixation apparatus.

Authors:  B T Briggs; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The management of open and complex fractures of the tibia.

Authors:  J P Stone; D C Mears; J Jarrett
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1980-04

8.  The comparative stiffness of external fixation frames.

Authors:  G E Kempson; D Campbell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Rigidity and stress analyses of external fracture fixation devices--a theoretical approach.

Authors:  E Y Chao; R A Kasman; K N An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Development of a variable stiffness external fixation system for stabilization of segmental defects of the tibia.

Authors:  A F Tencer; B Claudi; S Pearce; R W Bucholz; K D Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hoffmann half-frame external fixation rigidity and its relationship to universal joint slippage.

Authors:  F L Drijber; J B Finlay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.