Literature DB >> 3950810

Guidelines for external fixation frame rigidity and stresses.

R Huiskes, E Y Chao.   

Abstract

Using results from FEM analyses and experiments as references, analytical methods are applied to develop simple approximate formulas to relate frame rigidity, maximal pin stresses, and peak pin-bone stresses in external fracture fixation (EFF) configurations in axial loading to the most important frame, pin, and bone parameters. It is found that, in a realistic range, the parameters can be adapted to vary the frame rigidity from about 13 N/mm to 17,000 N/mm, thereby reducing the maximal stresses in the pins and at the pin-bone interface by a factor of 140. In particular, when compromises have to be established in the frame characteristics in order to ensure a flexible configuration and limit the stress values at the same time, the formulas presented can provide useful guidelines. The side-bar separation and the pin modulus, in particular, can be adapted to decrease the rigidity, while only moderately increasing the stresses, thereby reducing changes for pin failure, pin-bone loosening, and pin-tract infection. A nomogram is presented for a quick reference to estimated relations between frame characteristics, rigidity, and stresses. It is believed that this material may be of use in EFF design and applications in clinical and animal experimental trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3950810     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100040108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

1.  Structural stiffness of the Hoffmann simple anterior tibial external fixation frame.

Authors:  J Vossoughi; Y Youm; M Bosse; A R Burgess; A Poka
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Comparison of the mechanical performance of three types of unilateral, dynamizable external fixators. An experimental study.

Authors:  R A Jaskulka; E Egkher; B Wielke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Biomechanical features of six design of the delta external fixator for treating Pilon fracture: a finite element study.

Authors:  Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Mohd Ayub Sulong; Evelyn Garcia-Nieto; Daniel Angure Penaranda; Antonio Ros Felip; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Stability with unilateral external fixation in the tibia.

Authors:  N Giotakis; B Narayan
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2007-04

5.  Mechanical rigidity of the Ortho-SUV frame compared to the Ilizarov frame in the correction of femoral deformity.

Authors:  Petr V Skomoroshko; Victor A Vilensky; Ahmed I Hammouda; Matt D A Fletcher; Leonid N Solomin
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  An engineering review of external fixators.

Authors:  P L N Fernando; Aravinda Abeygunawardane; Pci Wijesinghe; Parakrama Dharmaratne; Pujitha Silva
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RIGIDITY OF EXTERNAL FIXATOR AND NUMBER OF PINS: COMPUTER ANALYSIS USING FINITE ELEMENTS.

Authors:  Marcelo Back Sternick; Darlan Dallacosta; Daniela Águida Bento; Marcelo Lemos do Reis
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04

8.  Finite element analysis of the equivalent stress distribution in Schanz screws during the use of a femoral fracture distractor.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos; William Dias Belangero; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Pedro José Labronici; Hilton Augusto Koch
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-07-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.