Literature DB >> 7263032

The comparative stiffness of external fixation frames.

G E Kempson, D Campbell.   

Abstract

The stiffness of 6 external fixation frames was compared by measuring the deflection which occurred at an unstable fracture, created in a tibia in vitro. All tests were repeated with the frames applied to pins brazed into a steel tube, in order to eliminate any errors caused by variation in the quality of the bone under test. The results of these tests are presented and observations are made on some design features of the frames. It was found that the 2 most critical factors which determined the stiffness of a frame were the diameter and the number of pins used to transfix the bone. Other factors, such as the stiffness of the connecting bar, were of secondary importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7263032     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(81)90205-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Emergency external fixators.

Authors:  P C May
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-25

2.  Structural stiffness of the Hoffmann simple anterior tibial external fixation frame.

Authors:  J Vossoughi; Y Youm; M Bosse; A R Burgess; A Poka
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Stability of the original Hoffman and AO tubular external fixation devices.

Authors:  T K Moroz; J B Finlay; C H Rorabeck; R B Bourne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The deformation of external fixation devices during loading.

Authors:  E O Karaharju; K Aalto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A strain-gauge study of the effect of external fixation on the canine tibia.

Authors:  K J Matushek; G Sumner-Smith; J Schatzker; T C Hearn; C Taves; J Hoare
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.