| Literature DB >> 27270859 |
Xiuyan Feng1,2, Ying Zheng1,2, Xun Gong1.
Abstract
Climatic oscillations in the Pleistocene have had profound effects on the demography and genetic diversity of many extant species. Cycas guizhouensis Lan &R.F. Zou is an endemic and endangered species in Southwest China that is primarily distributed along the valleys of the Nanpan River. In this study, we used four chloroplast DNAs (cpDNA), three nuclear genes (nDNA) and 13 microsatellite (SSR) loci to investigate the genetic structure, divergence time and demographic history of 11 populations of C. guizhouensis. High genetic diversity and high levels of genetic differentiation among the populations were observed. Two evolutionary units were revealed based on network and Structure analysis. The divergence time estimations suggested that haplotypes of C. guizhouensis were diverged during the Middle-Upper Pleistocene. Additionally, the demographic histories deduced from different DNA sequences were discordant, but overall indicated that C. guizhouensis had experienced a recent population expansion during the post-glacial period. Microsatellite data revealed that there was a contraction in effective population size in the past. These genetic features allow conservation measures to be taken to ensure the protection of this endangered species from extinction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27270859 PMCID: PMC4895228 DOI: 10.1038/srep27368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Geographical distribution of 11 populations of C. guizhouensis and distribution of its haplotypes detected from cpDNA (A), GTP (B), PHYP (C) and F3H (D). Population codes refer to Table S1. Maps were drawn using the software ArcGIS version 10.2 (http://desktop.arcgis.com) and modified using Photoshop (Adobe Corporation, California, America).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on DNA sequences and microsatellites for populations of C. guizhouensis, note: *** P < 0.001.
| cpDNA | Among populations | 10 | 105.545 | 1.01172 | 69.82 | 0.698*** |
| Within populations | 99 | 43.300 | 0.43737 | 30.18 | ||
| Among populations | 10 | 6.809 | 0.02942 | 24.11 | 0.241*** | |
| Within populations | 209 | 19.350 | 0.09258 | 75.89 | ||
| Among populations | 10 | 21.818 | 0.09805 | 30.75 | 0.308*** | |
| Within populations | 209 | 46.150 | 0.22081 | 69.25 | ||
| Among populations | 10 | 88.264 | 0.36458 | 19.20 | 0.192*** | |
| Within populations | 209 | 320.750 | 1.53469 | 80.80 | ||
| SSR | Among populations | 10 | 197.779 | 0.44772 | 13.80 | 0.138*** |
| Within populations | 407 | 1138.037 | 2.79616 | 86.20 |
Figure 2Network of haplotypes of C. guizhouensis based on cpDNA (A), GTP (B), PHYP (C) and F3H (D). The numbers on branches indicate mutational steps. Haplotype distribution in 11 populations refers to Table S2.
Figure 3BEAST-derived trees based on cpDNA (A) and the nuclear genes GTP (B), PHYP (C) and F3H (D). The numbers on branches represent divergence time (MYA). Haplotype distribution in 11 populations refers to Table S2.
Figure 4Bayesian skyline plots based on cpDNA (A) and the nuclear genes GTP (B), PHYP (C) and F3H (D) for the estimate of fluctuations in effective population size over time. Black line: median estimation; area between gray lines: 95% confidence interval. MIS: Marine Isotope Stage.
Genetic diversity within populations of C. guizhouensis, note: N T, total number of alleles; N P, private alleles; A R, allelic richness; N A, number of alleles; A E, the effective number of alleles; I, Shannon’s information index; H O, observed heterozygosity; H E, expected heterozygosity; UHE, Nei’s unbiased heterozygosity; F, fixation index; PPB, the percentage of polymorphic loci; Ne, effective population size.
| AL | 43 | 1 | 2.963 | 3.308 | 2.248 | 0.717 | 0.285 | 0.372 | 0.382 | 0.159 | 84.62 | 8 |
| YP | 33 | 0 | 2.255 | 2.538 | 1.680 | 0.543 | 0.250 | 0.328 | 0.336 | 0.163 | 84.62 | 13.8 |
| LW | 51 | 6 | 3.305 | 3.923 | 2.390 | 0.786 | 0.300 | 0.402 | 0.412 | 0.204 | 92.31 | 9.8 |
| LL | 57 | 6 | 3.530 | 4.385 | 2.753 | 0.770 | 0.281 | 0.362 | 0.371 | 0.246 | 76.92 | 981 |
| XL | 44 | 5 | 3.299 | 3.385 | 2.054 | 0.739 | 0.273 | 0.394 | 0.413 | 0.249 | 84.62 | 12.2 |
| SZ | 54 | 3 | 3.662 | 4.154 | 2.560 | 0.720 | 0.204 | 0.331 | 0.339 | 0.203 | 84.62 | 48.8 |
| LX | 67 | 3 | 4.292 | 5.154 | 3.118 | 1.003 | 0.331 | 0.463 | 0.475 | 0.243 | 92.31 | 21.7 |
| ML | 65 | 5 | 3.985 | 5.000 | 2.758 | 0.984 | 0.427 | 0.483 | 0.495 | 0.102 | 92.31 | 4.9 |
| KY | 65 | 6 | 4.001 | 5.000 | 2.674 | 0.947 | 0.323 | 0.453 | 0.464 | 0.212 | 92.31 | 34.2 |
| JS | 71 | 7 | 4.420 | 5.462 | 2.872 | 1.023 | 0.333 | 0.474 | 0.488 | 0.251 | 92.31 | 33.5 |
| SP | 76 | 7 | 4.799 | 5.846 | 3.757 | 1.175 | 0.415 | 0.546 | 0.560 | 0.214 | 92.31 | 51.9 |
| Mean | 57 | 4.46 | 3.656 | 4.378 | 2.624 | 0.855 | 0.311 | 0.419 | 0.431 | 0.204 | 88.11 | 110.9 |
Figure 5(A) Bayesian inference using STRUCTURE (K = 2) and (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of SSR phenotype from 11 populations of 209 individuals of C. guizhouensis.
Bottleneck analysis using microsatellite loci from 11 populations of C. guizhouensis, note: P is test for heterozygosity excess, * P < 0.05, significantly different; ** P < 0.01, highly significantly different.
| AL | 0.007** | 0.021* | 0.122 | 0.080 | L | 0.433 |
| YP | 0.124 | 0.021* | 0.297 | 0.376 | L | 0.359 |
| LW | 0.048* | 0.058 | 0.460 | 0.787 | L | 0.414 |
| LL | 0.260 | 0.216 | 0.529 | 0.946 | L | 0.478 |
| XL | 0.141 | 0.146 | 0.473 | 0.787 | L | 0.455 |
| SZ | 0.038* | 0.007** | 0.298 | 0.191 | L | 0.424 |
| LX | 0.318 | 0.736 | 0.115 | 0.244 | L | 0.374 |
| ML | 0.308 | 0.168 | 0.524 | 0.946 | L | 0.426 |
| KY | 0.322 | 0.273 | 0.276 | 0.588 | L | 0.417 |
| JS | 0.556 | 0.636 | 0.119 | 0.340 | L | 0.436 |
| SP | 0.055 | 0.001** | 0.302 | 0.273 | L | 0.363 |