| Literature DB >> 32140633 |
Siyue Xiao1,2, Yunheng Ji1, Jian Liu1, Xun Gong1.
Abstract
Cycas panzhihuaensis L. Zhou & S. Y. Yang (Cycadaceae) is an endangered gymnosperm species endemic to the dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River basin in southwest China. Although the wild C. panzhihuaensis population from Panzhihua Cycad Natural Reserve is well protected and its genetic diversity has been well assessed, the genetic characteristics of populations outside the nature reserve, which face larger risks of extinction, remain unknown. Furthermore, the population genetics and historical dynamics of this endemic and endangered species have not been examined across its entire range. In this study, to analyze the genetic diversity, phylogeographical structure and demographic history of C. panzhihuaensis from all its seven known locations, we sequenced and compared molecular data from chloroplastic DNA (psbA-trnH, psbM-trnD, and trnS-trnG), single-copy nuclear genes (PHYP, AC5, HSP70, and AAT) from 61 individuals, as well as 11 nuclear microsatellite loci (SSR) from 102 individuals. We found relatively high genetic diversity within populations and high genetic differentiation among populations of C. panzhihuaensis, which is consistent with the patterns of other Asian inland cycads. Although no significant phylogeographical structure was detected, we found that small and unprotected populations possess higher genetic diversity and more unique haplotypes, which revises our understanding of diversity within this species and deserves due attention. Analysis of demographic dynamics suggest that human activity might be the key threat to C. panzhihuaensis. Based on the genetic characterization of C. panzhihuaensis, we propose several practical guidelines for the conservation of this species, especially for the populations with small sizes.Entities:
Keywords: Chloroplast and nuclear DNA; Conservation; Cycas panzhihuaensis; Genetic diversity; Microsatellite; Phylogeography
Year: 2019 PMID: 32140633 PMCID: PMC7046506 DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2019.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Divers ISSN: 2468-2659
Fig. 1Geographical distributions of haplotypes identified in seven populations of C. panzhihuaensis (a) cpDNA; (b) nDNA PHYP; (c) N3. Blue lines represent Jinsha River and its tributaries. Frequencies of haplotypes in each population are indicated by the proportions of pie diagrams. DSS, Dasongshu town; PDH, Puduhe zones, Natural Reserve of Jiaozishan; PZH, Natural Reserve of Panzhihua; WQ, Wenquan town; SL, Songling town; JPD, Jiaopingdu town; GH, Guanhe town. Maps were drawn by ArcGIS v10.2 (http://desktop.arcgis.com).
Parameters of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation for the combined cpDNA, nDNA PHYP, and three combined nDNA markers (N3) in seven populations of C. panzhihuaensis.
| Marker | U test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | 0.8033 | 2.59 | 0.235 (0.1168) | 0.881 (0.0926) | 0.733 (0.1314) | 0.782 (0.1298) | non-significant |
| 0.3302 | 0.4 | 0.257 (0.1025) | 0.366 (0.1133) | 0.296 (0.0480) | 0.296 (0.0652) | non-significant | |
| N3 | 0.7350 | 0.56 | 0.506 (0.1016) | 0.769 (0.1078) | 0.342 (0.0919) | 0.420 (0.1202) | non-significant |
: Haplotype (gene) diversity; : Nucleotide diversity; : Sequence diversity within population; : Total sequence diversity; , : The coefficient of genetic differentiation for non-ordered alleles.
Parameters of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation for 11 microsatellite markers in seven populations of C. panzhihuaensis.
| Pop | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | ||||
| DSS | 20 | 63.64% | 1.909 | 0.251 | 1.605 | 0.179 | 0.461 | 0.116 | 0.286 | 0.095 | 0.298 | 0.075 | 0.061 | 0.160 | 0.9 |
| PDH | 20 | 72.73% | 2.545 | 0.455 | 1.589 | 0.204 | 0.515 | 0.137 | 0.118 | 0.028 | 0.282 | 0.073 | 0.456 | 0.100 | 3.3 |
| PZH | 20 | 72.73% | 3.273 | 0.662 | 1.861 | 0.409 | 0.606 | 0.175 | 0.182 | 0.060 | 0.306 | 0.082 | 0.440 | 0.126 | 17.6 |
| WQ | 20 | 81.82% | 2.818 | 0.536 | 1.953 | 0.379 | 0.630 | 0.162 | 0.236 | 0.064 | 0.353 | 0.081 | 0.347 | 0.117 | 15.4 |
| SL | 11 | 90.91% | 3.273 | 0.524 | 2.373 | 0.374 | 0.825 | 0.179 | 0.107 | 0.042 | 0.445 | 0.090 | 0.643 | 0.126 | 1.8 |
| JPD | 6 | 72.73% | 2.091 | 0.315 | 1.835 | 0.265 | 0.552 | 0.139 | 0.227 | 0.079 | 0.347 | 0.081 | 0.246 | 0.180 | – |
| GH | 5 | 54.55% | 1.909 | 0.315 | 1.541 | 0.178 | 0.428 | 0.134 | 0.164 | 0.065 | 0.262 | 0.079 | 0.302 | 0.165 | – |
| Total | 102 | 72.73% | 2.545 | 0.178 | 1.822 | 0.113 | 0.574 | 0.056 | 0.189 | 0.025 | 0.328 | 0.030 | 0.374 | 0.054 | 39.0 |
: sample size, : number of alleles, : number of effective alleles, : Shannon's index, : observed heterozygosity, : expected heterozygosity, : fixation index, : percentage of polymorphic loci. Ne of population JPD and GH could not be detected because of the insufficient sample size.
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of combined cpDNA, nuclear gene PHYP, combined nDNA sequences (N3) sequences and microsatellite markers of C. panzhihuaensis.
| Markers | Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | Among populations | 6 | 157.166 | 2.980 | 86.60 | 0.866 | 0.039 |
| Within populations | 54 | 24.900 | 0.461 | 13.40 | |||
| Among populations | 6 | 211.481 | 1.824 | 32.73 | 0.327 | 0.514 | |
| Within populations | 115 | 431.150 | 3.749 | 67.27 | |||
| N3 | Among populations | 6 | 29.848 | 0.266 | 40.83 | 0.408 | 0.362 |
| Within populations | 115 | 44.300 | 0.385 | 59.17 | |||
| microsatellite | Among populations | 6 | 165.258 | 0.912 | 33.06 | 0.331 | 0.506 |
| Within populations | 197 | 363.830 | 1.847 | 66.94 |
d.f.: degrees of freedom; : fixation index; : gene flow = (1-FST)/4*FST.
Fig. 2STRUCTURE analyses and Principal Coordinate Analyses of 102 individuals from seven populations of C. panzhihuaensis based on phenotypes of 11 microsatellite markers. Determining the optimal K value using mean likelihood L(K) (a) and delta K values (b) generated by STRUCTURE HARVESTER, with 20 replications, respectively; (c) results of the STRUCTURE analyses (K = 2 and k = 5); (d) Principal coordinate analysis.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic relationship and median-joining network of haplotypes. (Left) Phylogenetic relationship of haplotypes based on Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) with Cycas guizhouensis used as outgroup. Numbers above clades are the posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap values (BP) respectively with PP < 0.50 and BP < 50 not displayed. Numbers below clades indicate the divergence time as well as their 95% highest posterior density (HPD). (Right) Median-joining network of haplotypes inferred from different datasets: (a) cpDNA; (b) PHYP; (c) N3. Color and size of pies correspond to haplotypes and proportion of individuals respectively.
Fig. 4Mismatch distribution plots and Bayesian Skyline Plots of C. panzhihuaensis based on different datasets. (a–c) Mismatch distribution plots based on different datasets: (a) cpDNA; (b) PHYP; (c) N3. Multimodal graphs indicate demographic equilibrium and unimodal graphs often indicate population expansions. (d–f) The plots reflect the effective population size fluctuation over time. (d) cpDNA; (e) PHYP; (f) N3. Black lines: median estimation; area between blue lines: 95% confidence interval; Red lines: horizontal lines for reference.
Parameters of neutrality tests and mismatch analysis based on cpDNA and nuclear genes of C. panzhihuaensis.
| Marker | Tajima's D | Fu and Li's D | Fu and Li's F | Fu's Fs | SSD | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | 0.493,325 | 1.82,738 | 1.59,999 | 13.648 | 0.06186 | 0.16,882 |
| −1.19,639 | −0.06795 | −0.52,146 | −2.021 | 0.20,020# | 0.34,830 | |
| N3 | −0.19,000 | 1.17,849 | 0.84,329 | −2.791 | 0.00920 | 0.11,837 |
SSD: the sum-of-squared deviations; R: raggedness index; #: P < 0.05 significant difference.
Bottleneck analysis and Garza-Williamson index based on microsatellite loci from seven populations of C. panzhihuaensis.
| Population | TPM | SMM | Mode shift | Garza-Williamson index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sign test | Wilcoxon test | Sign test | Wilcoxon test | |||
| DSS | 0.01328* | 0.00073** | 0.01422* | 0.02100* | shifted mode | 0.45,034 |
| PDH | 0.08215* | 0.17,480 | 0.43,846 | 0.51,953 | L-shaped distribution | 0.41,138 |
| PZH | 0.34,274 | 0.57,715 | 0.33,621 | 0.70,020 | L-shaped distribution | 0.43,259 |
| WQ | 0.22,812 | 0.06738* | 0.47,564 | 0.36,523 | L-shaped distribution | 0.39,331 |
| SL | 0.02812* | 0.00098** | 0.02932* | 0.00684** | L-shaped distribution | 0.45,275 |
| JPD | 0.02284* | 0.00342** | 0.03018* | 0.00684** | shifted mode | 0.39,471 |
| GH | – | – | – | – | – | 0.34,077 |
| Mean | – | – | – | – | – | 0.41,083 |
*: P < 0.05, significant difference; **: P < 0.01, highly significant difference. Indices of population GH could not be detected by Bottleneck analysis because of its insufficient sample size.