| Literature DB >> 27629063 |
Ying Zheng1,2, Jian Liu1,2, Xun Gong1.
Abstract
Dramatic crustal deformation and river incision in Southwest China induced by the Indo-Asian collision have long been argued to contribute to the complicated landscapes, heterogeneous environment and abundant biodiversity in this region. However, biological impacts in promoting intraspecific phylogeographical subdivision and divergence along the Red River Fault zone (RRF) remain poorly understood. To investigate the possible biological effects of tectonic movements and environment variations within the RRF, the phylogeography of Cycas dolichophylla-an endemic but widely distributed Cycas in Southwest China and North Vietnam along the RRF were carried out based on four chloroplast DNA intergenic spacers (cpDNA), three nuclear DNA sequences (nDNA) and 16 simple sequence repeat variations (SSR). Two different phylogeographical patterns were detected: a Southwest-Northeast break across the RRF disclosed by chlorotypes and a China-Vietnam separation revealed by SSR. A Bayesian skyline plot from cpDNA data demonstrated a historical increasing, but a recent declining, dynamic in population size during the Pleistocene. Consequently, we infer it is the local environmental variation during Cenozoic that contributed to the complex landscape and microclimate mosaics, facilitating speciation and divergence of C. dolichophylla. Subsequently, the Quaternary climatic fluctuations coupled with human activities profoundly influenced the genetic structure and demographic history of this species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27629063 PMCID: PMC5024324 DOI: 10.1038/srep33540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sampling sites and geographical distributions of chlorotypes (a) and nuclotypes ((b) GTP; (c) PHYP; (d) PPRC) identified in the 13 populations of C. dolichophylla along the RRF, with networks of each haplotype displayed on the upper right corner. The sizes of the circles in the networks are proportional to the observed frequencies of the haplotypes and numbers above the lines mean the mutational steps. The black dots are the missing haplotypes. The red curve represents the Red River, separating this species into two lineages: the pink shadow area comprises populations from southwestern clade and the light blue area occupied by northeastern clade. The blue straight line in Fig. 1a stands for the modified ‘Tanaka line’. Maps were drawn using the software ArcGIS version 10.2 (http://desktop.arcgis.com) and modified using Photoshop (Adobe Corporation, California, America).
Composition of haplotypes, haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) inferred from combined cpDNA sequences and nDNA sequences of C. dolichophylla investigated in this study.
| Code | cpDNA | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haplotypes (No.) | Haplotypes (No.) | Haplotypes (No.) | Haplotypes (No.) | |||||||||
| BN | C1(9)C2(1) | 0.200 | 0.160 | G1(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 | P1(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 | R1(18)R2(2) | 0.189 | 0.260 |
| BX | C3(3)C4(2)C5(1)C6(3)C7(1) | 0.844 | 1.900 | G2(16)G3(2)G4(2) | 0.358 | 2.090 | P2(13)P3(5)P4(1)P5(1) | 0.537 | 1.370 | R3(17)R4(2) R5(1) | 0.279 | 1.550 |
| CP | C8(3) C9(7) | 0.467 | 1.140 | G2(4)G5(9)G6(7) | 0.668 | 2.010 | P1(1)P2(9) P6(1)P7(2)P8(7) | 0.695 | 1.880 | R6(1)R7(3)R8(2)R9(7)R10(7) | 0.758 | 3.560 |
| DV | C10(4)C11(5) C12(1) | 0.644 | 0.420 | G2(14)G5(3)G7(2) G8(1) | 0.500 | 2.550 | P2(9)P3(3)P5(7)P7(1) | 0.684 | 4.440 | R3(18)R4(2) | 0.189 | 1.050 |
| HS | C13(8) C14(2) | 0.356 | 1.260 | G2(16) G7(4) | 0.337 | 2.350 | P1(1)P2(11)P3(8) | 0.563 | 0.750 | R3(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| JM | C15(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 | G2(11)G7(4)G9(5) | 0.626 | 4.320 | P2(12) P9(8) | 0.505 | 0.530 | R3(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| MG | C16(9) C17(1) | 0.200 | 0.380 | G1(2)G2(18) | 0.189 | 1.980 | P1(1)P2(11)P3(8) | 0.563 | 0.750 | R3(18)R4(2) | 0.189 | 1.050 |
| MLP | C18(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 | G2(1)G3(5)G5(1)G10(13) | 0.537 | 1.870 | P10(10)P11(4)P12(2)P13(1)P14(1)P15(1)P16(1) | 0.663 | 2.380 | R3(10)R9(10) | 0.526 | 2.920 |
| NH | C19(9) C20(1) | 0.000 | 0.000 | G2(12)G5(8) | 0.505 | 1.760 | P2(8)P3(10)P4(1)P5(1) | 0.616 | 1.510 | R3(18)R4(2) | 0.189 | 1.050 |
| NHC | C11(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 | G2(17)G5(1) G8(2) | 0.279 | 1.600 | P2(10)P3(7)P4(1)P5(2) | 0.647 | 2.210 | R3(16)R11(4) | 0.337 | 0.470 |
| PB | C21(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 | G11(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 | P17(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 | R920) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| TH | C22(3)C23(6) C24(1) | 0.467 | 0.250 | G2(14)G5(4) G7(1)G12(1) | 0.489 | 2.070 | P7(13)P18(6)P19(1) | 0.511 | 1.080 | R3(2)R7(16)R8(1) R9(1) | 0.363 | 1.560 |
| XL | C25(5)C26(4) C27(1) | 0.644 | 0.670 | G2(13)G5(5) G7(1)G12(1) | 0.537 | 2.240 | P1(1)P2(1)P7(9)P18(1)P20(3)P21(4)P22(1) | 0.763 | 2.600 | R3(8)R6(1)R7(5)R8(3)R9(3) | 0.768 | 4.020 |
| Total | 0.940 | 2.510 | 0.677 | 3.840 | 0.809 | 2.900 | 0.642 | 3.160 | ||||
Hd: haplotype diversity; Pi: nucleotide diversity.
Figure 2BEAST-generated maximum clade credibility tree of chlorotypes from 13 C. dolichophylla populations, with C. edentata and C. rumphii set as outgroups.
The topologies derived from Bayesian Inference and Maximum Parsimony accord with BEAST trees, except for minor incongruences at nodes with low confidence level. Numbers above the branches indicate posterior probabilities (left) and bootstrap values (right) from the Maximum Parsimony principle (>50 are shown). Numbers below branches denote the divergence times with 95% HPD.
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of the concatenated cpDNA sequences, chloroplast sequences from northeast and southwest populations of the RRF, as well as nDNA sequences in all populations of C. dolichophylla.
| Markers | Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | Among populations | 12 | 676.16 | 5.53 | 83.68 | 0.84 | 0.05 |
| Within populations | 117 | 126.10 | 1.08 | 16.32 | |||
| Northeast | Among populations | 6 | 242.54 | 3.91 | 74.59 | 0.75 | 0.08 |
| Within populations | 63 | 83.90 | 1.33 | 25.41 | |||
| Southwest | Among populations | 5 | 182.87 | 3.58 | 82.08 | 0.82 | 0.05 |
| Within populations | 54 | 42.20 | 0.78 | 17.92 | |||
| Among populations | 12 | 167.90 | 0.67 | 55.08 | 0.55 | 0.20 | |
| Within populations | 247 | 135.40 | 0.55 | 44.92 | |||
| Among populations | 12 | 213.93 | 0.85 | 50.90 | 0.51 | 0.24 | |
| Within populations | 247 | 202.65 | 0.82 | 49.10 | |||
| Among populations | 12 | 174.91 | 0.70 | 59.24 | 0.59 | 0.17 | |
| Within populations | 247 | 119.75 | 0.48 | 40.76 |
D.f.: degrees of freedom; FST: the fixation index; Nm: gene flows.
Genetic diversity and differentiation parameters (mean ± SE in parentheses) for the jointed cpDNA matrix, chloroplast sequences from northeast and southwest populations of the RRF, as well as nDNA sequences in all populations of C. dolichophylla.
| Markers | U test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | 0.320 (0.082) | 0.994 (0.014) | 0.834 (0.063) | 0.678 (0.082) | |
| Northeast | 0.321 (0.121) | 0.976 (0.041) | 0.740 (0.121) | 0.672 (0.125) | non-significant |
| Southwest | 0.319 (0.119) | 1.000 (0.036) | 0.823 (0.099) | 0.681 (0.119) | significant |
| 0.387 (0.061) | 0.719 (0.084) | 0.551 (0.144) | 0.463 (0.121) | non-significant | |
| 0.524 (0.068) | 0.869 (0.045) | 0.509 (0.118) | 0.397 (0.099) | non-significant | |
| 0.291 (0.072) | 0.670 (0.106) | 0.592 (0.094) | 0.565 (0.102) | non-significant |
Hs: the mean genetic diversity within populations; HT: total genetic diversity for species; GST and NST: coefficient of population differentiation.
*: P < 0.05, significant difference.
Figure 3Bayesian skyline plots based on cpDNA (a) and nDNA ((b) GTP; (c) PHYP; (d) PPRC) for the effective population size fluctuation throughout time. The gray areas indicate the last stage of the last glacial period (32–12 ka).