| Literature DB >> 28580005 |
Xiuyan Feng1,2, Jian Liu1,2, Yu-Chung Chiang3, Xun Gong1,4.
Abstract
Climate change, species dispersal ability and habitat fragmentation are major factors influencing species distribution and genetic diversity, especially for the range-restricted and threatened taxa. Here, using four sequences of chloroplast DNAs (cpDNAs), three nuclear genes (nDNAs) and 12 nuclear microsatellites (SSRs), we investigated the genetic diversity, genetic structure, divergence time and population dynamics of Cycas segmentifida D. Y. Wang and C. Y. Deng, a threatened cycad species endemic to Southwest China. High levels of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation were revealed in C. segmentifida. Haplotypes of networks showed two evolutionary units in C. segmentifida, with the exception of the nuclear gene GTP network. Meanwhile, the UPGMA tree, structure and PCoA analyses suggested that 14 populations of C. segmentifida were divided into two clades. There was significant effect of isolation by distance (IBD) in this species. However, this species did not display a significant phylogeographic structure. The divergence time estimation suggested that its haplotypes diverged during the Middle Pleistocene. Additionally, the population dynamics inferred from different DNA sequences analyses were discordant. Bottleneck analysis showed that populations of C. segmentifida did not experience any recent bottleneck effect, but rather pointed to a contraction of its effective population size over time. Furthermore, our results suggested that the population BM which held an intact population structure and occupied undisturbed habitat was at the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, implying that this population is a free-mating system. These genetic features provide important information for the sustainable management of C. segmentifida.Entities:
Keywords: Cycas segmentifida; conservation; genetic diversity; genetic structure; population dynamics
Year: 2017 PMID: 28580005 PMCID: PMC5437697 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on DNA sequences and microsatellites for populations of C. segmentifida.
| Marker | Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpDNA | Among populations | 13 | 1264.622 | 9.94365 | 99.80 | 0.998∗∗∗ | |
| Within populations | 123 | 2.400 | 0.01951 | 0.20 | |||
| Among populations | 13 | 0.563 | 0.00037 | 1.02 | 0.010 | 49399 | |
| Within populations | 260 | 9.379 | 0.03607 | 98.98 | |||
| Among populations | 13 | 89.763 | 0.31306 | 28.62 | 0.286∗∗∗ | 1243.755 | |
| Within populations | 260 | 203.014 | 0.78082 | 71.38 | |||
| Among populations | 13 | 146.242 | 0.53799 | 42.59 | 0.426∗∗∗ | 581.086 | |
| Within populations | 260 | 188.564 | 0.72525 | 57.41 | |||
| SSR | Among populations | 13 | 383.854 | 0.79385 | 22.89 | 0.229∗∗∗ | 1678.039 |
| Within populations | 462 | 1235.367 | 2.67395 | 77.11 |
Genetic diversity within populations of C. segmentifida.
| Population | UHE | Ne | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY | 52 | 3 | 2.794 | 4.333 | 2.197 | 0.834 | 0.325 | 0.410 | 0.420 | 0.156 | 83.33 | 8.8 |
| JZ | 39 | 0 | 2.859 | 3.250 | 2.507 | 0.848 | 0.450 | 0.458 | 0.482 | -0.006 | 83.33 | 2.6 |
| LK | 36 | 2 | 2.306 | 3.000 | 2.019 | 0.629 | 0.263 | 0.332 | 0.340 | 0.133 | 75.00 | 23.8 |
| LKA | 38 | 0 | 2.296 | 3.167 | 1.886 | 0.640 | 0.258 | 0.345 | 0.354 | 0.266 | 75.00 | 16.4 |
| BM | 38 | 2 | 2.702 | 3.167 | 1.833 | 0.662 | 0.371 | 0.364 | 0.373 | -0.044 | 91.67 | 22.9 |
| NZ | 52 | 2 | 2.328 | 4.333 | 2.278 | 0.868 | 0.360 | 0.441 | 0.452 | 0.123 | 91.67 | 36.6 |
| BD | 53 | 1 | 2.825 | 4.417 | 2.697 | 1.015 | 0.511 | 0.513 | 0.531 | -0.026 | 91.67 | 81.4 |
| BA | 52 | 3 | 3.226 | 4.333 | 2.150 | 0.782 | 0.317 | 0.376 | 0.386 | 0.095 | 83.33 | 17.6 |
| YX | 41 | 0 | 3.123 | 3.417 | 2.401 | 0.855 | 0.379 | 0.449 | 0.485 | 0.102 | 75.00 | - |
| LLB | 41 | 0 | 2.693 | 3.417 | 2.283 | 0.768 | 0.424 | 0.401 | 0.418 | -0.087 | 83.33 | - |
| SL | 42 | 8 | 2.691 | 3.500 | 2.309 | 0.782 | 0.351 | 0.407 | 0.422 | 0.112 | 75.00 | 38.9 |
| PH | 75 | 2 | 3.677 | 6.250 | 3.650 | 1.164 | 0.467 | 0.517 | 0.530 | 0.068 | 91.67 | 72.3 |
| PHG | 67 | 6 | 3.605 | 5.667 | 3.698 | 1.141 | 0.471 | 0.522 | 0.535 | 0.037 | 91.67 | 25.3 |
| BB | 72 | 4 | 3.877 | 6.000 | 4.007 | 1.252 | 0.513 | 0.571 | 0.586 | 0.049 | 91.67 | 71.5 |
| Mean | 57 | 2.357 | 2.929 | 4.161 | 2.565 | 0.874 | 0.390 | 0.436 | 0.451 | 0.066 | 84.52 | 34.8 |
Bottleneck analyses for 14 populations of C. segmentifida.
| Population | TPM | SMM | Mode shift | Garza–Williamson index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sign test | Wilcoxon test | Sign test | Wilcoxon test | |||
| BY | 0.404 | 1.000 | 0.201 | 0.233 | L | 0.378 |
| JZ | 0.013ˆ* | 0.000ˆ*** | 0.214 | 0.008ˆ** | L | 0.383 |
| LK | 0.020ˆ* | 0.012ˆ* | 0.020ˆ* | 0.054 | L | 0.371 |
| LKA | 0.352 | 0.151 | 0.575 | 0.569 | L | 0.415 |
| BM | 0.183 | 0.301 | 0.207 | 0.677 | L | 0.404 |
| NZ | 0.403 | 0.117 | 0.390 | 0.519 | L | 0.410 |
| BD | 0.399 | 0.424 | 0.368 | 0.677 | L | 0.444 |
| BA | 0.177 | 0.092 | 0.613 | 0.791 | L | 0.370 |
| YX | 0.019ˆ* | 0.001ˆ** | 0.252 | 0.034ˆ* | L | 0.356 |
| LLB | 0.067 | 0.001ˆ** | 0.166 | 0.011ˆ* | L | 0.390 |
| SL | 0.046 | 0.011ˆ* | 0.178 | 0.380 | L | 0.381 |
| PH | 0.411 | 0.622 | 0.018ˆ* | 0.204 | L | 0.391 |
| PHG | 0.183 | 0.005ˆ** | 0.191 | 0.519 | L | 0.377 |
| BB | 0.073 | 0.042ˆ* | 0.385 | 0.850 | L | 0.375 |