Literature DB >> 18217811

Task and context determine where you look.

Constantin A Rothkopf1, Dana H Ballard, Mary M Hayhoe.   

Abstract

The deployment of human gaze has been almost exclusively studied independent of any specific ongoing task and limited to two-dimensional picture viewing. This contrasts with its use in everyday life, which mostly consists of purposeful tasks where gaze is crucially involved. To better understand deployment of gaze under such circumstances, we devised a series of experiments, in which subjects navigated along a walkway in a virtual environment and executed combinations of approach and avoidance tasks. The position of the body and the gaze were monitored during the execution of the task combinations and dependence of gaze on the ongoing tasks as well as the visual features of the scene was analyzed. Gaze distributions were compared to a random gaze allocation strategy as well as a specific "saliency model." Gaze distributions showed high similarity across subjects. Moreover, the precise fixation locations on the objects depended on the ongoing task to the point that the specific tasks could be predicted from the subject's fixation data. By contrast, gaze allocation according to a random or a saliency model did not predict the executed fixations or the observed dependence of fixation locations on the specific task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217811     DOI: 10.1167/7.14.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  82 in total

1.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Na Shao; Jie Li; Rende Shui; Xiaojie Zheng; Jiangang Lu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.

Authors:  Emilie L Josephs; Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 7.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Fernando Vargas-Martin; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Influence of low-level stimulus features, task dependent factors, and spatial biases on overt visual attention.

Authors:  Sepp Kollmorgen; Nora Nortmann; Sylvia Schröder; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.