Literature DB >> 31122134

In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.

Breanna McSweeney1, Jessica R Allegretti2, Monika Fischer3, Huiping Xu4, Karen J Goodman1, Tanya Monaghan5, Carmen McLeod6, Benjamin H Mullish7, Elaine O Petrof8, Emmalee L Phelps3, Roxana Chis8, Abby Edmison1, Angela Juby1, Ralph Ennis-Davis9, Brandi Roach10, Karen Wong10, Dina Kao10.   

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Stool donors are essential, but difficult to recruit and retain. We aimed to identify factors influencing willingness to donate stool. This multi-center study with a 32-item questionnaire targeted young adults and health care workers via social media and university email lists in Edmonton and Kingston, Canada; London and Nottingham, England; and Indianapolis and Boston, USA. Items included baseline demographics and FMT knowledge and perception. Investigated motivators and deterrents included economic compensation, screening process, time commitment, and stool donation logistics. Logistic regression and linear regression models estimated associations of study variables with self-assessed willingness to donate stool. 802 respondents completed our questionnaire: 387 (48.3%) age 21-30 years, 573 (71.4%) female, 323 (40%) health care workers. Country of residence, age and occupation were not associated with willingness to donate stool. Factors increasing willingness to donate were: already a blood donor (OR 1.64), male, altruism, economic benefit, knowledge of how FMT can help patients (OR 1.32), and positive attitudes towards FMT (OR 1.39). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were: stool collection unpleasant (OR 0.92), screening process invasive (OR 0.92), higher stool donation frequency, negative social perception of stool, and logistics of collection/transporting feces. We conclude that 1) blood donors and males are more willing to consider stool donation; 2) altruism, economic compensation, and positive feedback are motivators; and 3) screening process, high donation frequency, logistics of collection/transporting feces, lack of public awareness, and negative social perception are deterrents. Considering these variables could maximize donor recruitment and retention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); fecal transplant donors; recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (RCDI); stool donors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31122134      PMCID: PMC6973337          DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut Microbes        ISSN: 1949-0976


  46 in total

1.  Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Vrieze; Els Van Nood; Frits Holleman; Jarkko Salojärvi; Ruud S Kootte; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Geesje M Dallinga-Thie; Mariette T Ackermans; Mireille J Serlie; Raish Oozeer; Muriel Derrien; Anne Druesne; Johan E T Van Hylckama Vlieg; Vincent W Bloks; Albert K Groen; Hans G H J Heilig; Erwin G Zoetendal; Erik S Stroes; Willem M de Vos; Joost B L Hoekstra; Max Nieuwdorp
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Gamete donors' motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejervall; Ann-Louise Geijerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 3.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Christina M Surawicz; Lawrence J Brandt; David G Binion; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Scott R Curry; Peter H Gilligan; Lynne V McFarland; Mark Mellow; Brian S Zuckerbraun
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Is fecal microbiota transplantation the answer for irritable bowel syndrome? A single-center experience.

Authors:  David M Pinn; Olga C Aroniadis; Lawrence J Brandt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: review of donor features, procedures and outcomes in 168 clinical studies of faecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Cheuk Yin Lai; Joanne Sung; Felix Cheng; Whitney Tang; Sunny H Wong; Paul K S Chan; Michael A Kamm; Joseph J Y Sung; Gilaad Kaplan; Francis K L Chan; Siew C Ng
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Non-donors' attitudes towards sperm donation and their willingness to donate.

Authors:  Veerle Provoost; Florence Van Rompuy; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Economic Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection in European Countries.

Authors:  Elena Reigadas Ramírez; Emilio Santiago Bouza
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  A Comprehensive Study of Costs Associated With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues; Grant E Barber; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 9.  Update on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation 2015: Indications, Methodologies, Mechanisms, and Outlook.

Authors:  Colleen R Kelly; Stacy Kahn; Purna Kashyap; Loren Laine; David Rubin; Ashish Atreja; Thomas Moore; Gary Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences.

Authors:  S Purewal; O B A van den Akker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  8 in total

1.  Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations.

Authors:  Mèlanie V Bénard; Clara M A de Bruijn; Aline C Fenneman; Koen Wortelboer; Judith Zeevenhoven; Bente Rethans; Hilde J Herrema; Tom van Gool; Max Nieuwdorp; Marc A Benninga; Cyriel Y Ponsioen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Washed microbiota transplantation vs. manual fecal microbiota transplantation: clinical findings, animal studies and in vitro screening.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Gaochen Lu; Zhe Zhao; Yafei Liu; Quan Shen; Pan Li; Yaoyao Chen; Haoran Yin; Huiquan Wang; Cicilia Marcella; Bota Cui; Lei Cheng; Guozhong Ji; Faming Zhang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Determinants of community members' willingness to donate stool for faecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa K Hyde; Barbara M Masser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge, attitudes, ethical and social perspectives towards fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) among Jordanian healthcare providers.

Authors:  Amal G Al-Bakri; Amal A Akour; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  Skin and Gut Microbiome in Psoriasis: Gaining Insight Into the Pathophysiology of It and Finding Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Lihui Chen; Jie Li; Wu Zhu; Yehong Kuang; Tao Liu; Wei Zhang; Xiang Chen; Cong Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  A probiotic intervention on pain hypersensitivity and microbiota composition in patients with osteoarthritis pain: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paolo Pedersini; Marco Savoldi; Pedro Berjano; Jorge Hugo Villafañe
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.472

7.  What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences.

Authors:  Julia G Bottesini; Mijke Rhemtulla; Simine Vazire
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Washed preparation of faecal microbiota changes the transplantation related safety, quantitative method and delivery.

Authors:  Gaochen Lu; Weihong Wang; Pan Li; Quan Wen; Bota Cui; Faming Zhang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.575

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.