Literature DB >> 10739823

A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation.

A L Kalfoglou1, J Gittelsohn.   

Abstract

Oocyte donation is growing at an exponential rate. Currently, thousands of women donate each year. The health services that donors receive deserve evaluation. Thirty-three former donors were recruited from IVF clinics, a matching agency, the Internet, advertisements, and word of mouth. In-depth interviews were conducted to learn what motivated the donation, to determine how satisfied donors were with the experience and what issues played a role in donor satisfaction, and to identify recommendations to improve the process. None of the participants regretted their decision to donate, but they were not always completely satisfied with the donation experience. The physical process, compensation, quality of medical care, and level of involvement in the process were the primary factors that affected satisfaction. Matching agencies and IVF clinics may improve donor satisfaction by: minimizing trips to the clinic; using protocols that limit the number of intramuscular injections; reducing the risk of hyperstimulation syndrome; providing follow-up care; reimbursing for expenses such as lost work, travel, and child care; separating direct reimbursements from 'income' to decrease the amount of taxes donors must pay on compensation; treating donors with respect and appreciation; and informing them about the outcome. Improved donor satisfaction is likely to improve donor recruitment and retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739823     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.4.798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Authors:  Lindsay B Gezinski; Sharvari Karandikar; James Carter; Melinda White
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2016-05

3.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Egg donors' motivations, experiences, and opinions: A survey of egg donors in South Africa.

Authors:  Donrich Thaldar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.