Literature DB >> 1770150

Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors.

L R Schover1, R L Collins, M M Quigley, J Blankstein, G Kanoti.   

Abstract

Forty-five women were evaluated as candidates to donate oocytes to an infertile couple. Twenty-four women completed a cycle as oocyte donors. Follow-up data on donor satisfaction were obtained for 23 women. Ninety-one per cent were moderately to extremely satisfied with the experience and 74% would donate for another cycle if given the chance. Transient adverse psychological symptoms were reported by two donors but were resolved with medical or psychological treatment. Two women became pregnant soon after donation, one unintentionally. Psychological risk factors predicted donor candidates' decisions to participate and their compliance but were not predictive (within the group that completed a cycle) of donor satisfaction as follow-up or recipient pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1770150     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients.

Authors:  S R Lindheim; S Kavic; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  L Applegarth; N C Goldberg; I Cholst; N McGoff; D Fantini; N Zellers; A Black; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Authors:  Lindsay B Gezinski; Sharvari Karandikar; James Carter; Melinda White
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2016-05

5.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.