Literature DB >> 20083613

Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.

Denis Roze1, Richard E Michod.   

Abstract

In diploid populations, indirect benefits of sex may stem from segregation and recombination. Although it has been recognized that finite population size is an important component of selection for recombination, its effects on selection for segregation have been somewhat less studied. In this article, we develop analytical two- and three-locus models to study the effect of recurrent deleterious mutations on a modifier gene increasing sex, in a finite diploid population. The model also incorporates effects of mitotic recombination, causing loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Predictions are tested using multilocus simulations representing deleterious mutations occurring at a large number of loci. The model and simulations show that excess of heterozygosity generated by finite population size is an important component of selection for sex, favoring segregation when deleterious alleles are nearly additive to dominant. Furthermore, sex tends to break correlations in homozygosity among selected loci, which disfavors sex when deleterious alleles are either recessive or dominant. As a result, we find that it is difficult to maintain costly sex when deleterious alleles are recessive. LOH tends to favor sex when deleterious mutations are recessive, but the effect is relatively weak for rates of LOH corresponding to current estimates (of the order 10(-4)-10(-5)).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083613      PMCID: PMC2865910          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.108258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  72 in total

1.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L L Vassilieva; A M Hook; M Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  General models of multilocus evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Analysis of chromosomal instability in human colorectal adenomas with two mutational hits at APC.

Authors:  O M Sieber; K Heinimann; P Gorman; H Lamlum; M Crabtree; C A Simpson; D Davies; K Neale; S V Hodgson; R R Roylance; R K S Phillips; W F Bodmer; I P M Tomlinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 10.  Gene conversion: mechanisms, evolution and human disease.

Authors:  Jian-Min Chen; David N Cooper; Nadia Chuzhanova; Claude Férec; George P Patrinos
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  12 in total

1.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Relative effects of segregation and recombination on the evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  X Jiang; S Hu; Q Xu; Y Chang; S Tao
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Does the avoidance of sexual costs increase fitness in asexual invaders?

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Higher rates of sex evolve during adaptation to more complex environments.

Authors:  Pepijn Luijckx; Eddie Ka Ho Ho; Majid Gasim; Suyang Chen; Andrijana Stanic; Connor Yanchus; Yun Seong Kim; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Background Selection in Partially Selfing Populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutation Rate Evolution in Partially Selfing and Partially Asexual Organisms.

Authors:  Camille Gervais; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The evolution of obligate sex: the roles of sexual selection and recombination.

Authors:  Maya Kleiman; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Evolutionary genomics of epidemic visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Hideo Imamura; Tim Downing; Frederik Van den Broeck; Mandy J Sanders; Suman Rijal; Shyam Sundar; An Mannaert; Manu Vanaerschot; Maya Berg; Géraldine De Muylder; Franck Dumetz; Bart Cuypers; Ilse Maes; Malgorzata Domagalska; Saskia Decuypere; Keshav Rai; Surendra Uranw; Narayan Raj Bhattarai; Basudha Khanal; Vijay Kumar Prajapati; Smriti Sharma; Olivia Stark; Gabriele Schönian; Harry P De Koning; Luca Settimo; Benoit Vanhollebeke; Syamal Roy; Bart Ostyn; Marleen Boelaert; Louis Maes; Matthew Berriman; Jean-Claude Dujardin; James A Cotton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations.

Authors:  Denis Roze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.