Literature DB >> 27251671

[Choosing wisely in internal medicine].

G Hasenfuß1, E Märker-Hermann2, M Hallek3, U R Fölsch4.   

Abstract

"Choosing wisely - DGIM" is an initiative of the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM) to strengthen the quality of diagnostics and indications for therapy. Aspects of inappropriate patient care are identified based on scientific evidence in collaboration with12 internal medicine and associated societies. Identified aspects are reviewed and endorsed by an interdisciplinary consensus committee. Addressed are those diagnostic and therapeutic measures which are rarely used despite scientific evidence of their usefulness and those which are frequently used although clear evidence exists that the measures are not useful or even harmful. The resulting positive or negative recommendations are intended to support physicians in the assessment of indications. The relevance of the "Choosing wisely - DGIM" initiative is confirmed by a survey involving 4200 members of DGIM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus; Healthcare quality; Indication quality; Quality control; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251671     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-016-0062-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  2 in total

Review 1.  Update on medical overuse.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Scott M Wright; Sanket Dhruva
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Wolfson; John Santa; Lorie Slass
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.893

  2 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Response to and further development of the Choosing wisely initiative].

Authors:  U R Fölsch; M Hallek; T Raupach; G Hasenfuß
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  The French Society of Internal Medicine's Top-5 List of Recommendations: a National Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Nathan Peiffer-Smadja; Adeline Bauvois; Marie Chilles; Baptiste Gramont; Redwan Maatoug; Marie Bismut; Camille Thorey; Eric Oziol; Thomas Hanslik
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  [Choosing wisely recommendations in cardiology].

Authors:  K Werdan; S Baldus; N Frey; U Nixdorff; K-H Kuck; H Katus
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  [Characteristics of pharmacotherapy in older patients with rheumatism].

Authors:  H-J Lakomek; Christian Schulz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Jacques Cornuz; Christine Cohidon; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Nicolas Senn
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care - methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice.

Authors:  Cathleen Muche-Borowski; Dorit Abiry; Hans-Otto Wagner; Anne Barzel; Dagmar Lühmann; Günther Egidi; Thomas Kühlein; Martin Scherer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.