Literature DB >> 31190258

The French Society of Internal Medicine's Top-5 List of Recommendations: a National Web-Based Survey.

Nathan Peiffer-Smadja1,2, Adeline Bauvois3,4, Marie Chilles3, Baptiste Gramont3, Redwan Maatoug3, Marie Bismut3, Camille Thorey3, Eric Oziol5, Thomas Hanslik5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The international project "Choosing Wisely" aims to target unnecessary and potentially harmful examinations and treatments.
OBJECTIVE: To define the French Internal Medicine Top-5 list.
DESIGN: Based on a review of existing Top-5 lists and personal experience, a working group of the French National Society of Internal Medicine selected 27 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. They were submitted through a national web-based survey to French internists who rated from 1 to 5 the perceived frequency, uselessness, and risk of each procedure. A composite score was calculated as the unweighted addition of the three scores. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty internists answered the web-based survey (14% of all French internists including residents). All the French regions and status of the profession were represented. KEY
RESULTS: For the 27 submitted procedures, the mean score (± SD) was 3.25 (± 0.48) for frequency, 3.10 (± 0.43) for uselessness, and 2.63 (± 0.84) for risk. The Top-5 list obtained with the composite score was as follows: 1. Do not prescribe long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors without regular reevaluation of the indication 2. Do not administer preventive treatments (e.g., for dyslipidemia, hypertension…) in elderly people with dementia when potential risks outweigh the benefits 3. Do not administer hypnotic medications as first-line treatment for insomnia 4. Do not treat with an anticoagulant for more than 3 months a patient with a first venous thromboembolism occurring in the setting of a major transient risk factor 5. Do not screen for Lyme disease without an exposure history or related clinical examination findings We found that the composite score was strongly correlated to the risk score (rs = 0.88, p < 10-5) and not to the frequency (rs = 0.06, p = 0.75) or uselessness score (rs = 0.17, p = 0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: This Top-5 list provides an opportunity to discuss appropriate use of health care practices in internal medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choosing Wisely; inappropriate prescribing; internal medicine; overmedicalization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31190258      PMCID: PMC6667601          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  45 in total

1.  Choosing Wisely around the world.

Authors:  Lauren Vogel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Considering Cocreation for the Choosing Wisely List.

Authors:  Irene Timothy Lee; John Di Capua; Hyung J Cho
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign.

Authors:  Nicola Montano; Giorgio Costantino; Giovanni Casazza; Rodolfo Sbrojavacca; Marco Vincenzo Lenti; Lorenzo Falsetti; Annasanta Guzzo; Raffaele Majo; Francesco Perticone; Gino Roberto Corazza
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Barbara Farrell; Kevin Pottie; Wade Thompson; Taline Boghossian; Lisa Pizzola; Farah Joy Rashid; Carlos Rojas-Fernandez; Kate Walsh; Vivian Welch; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence.

Authors:  John A Heit
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato serology in the Netherlands: guidelines versus daily practice.

Authors:  J Coumou; J W R Hovius; A P van Dam
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Michael L LeFevre; Carol M Mangione; William R Phillips; Douglas K Owens; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Influence of preceding length of anticoagulant treatment and initial presentation of venous thromboembolism on risk of recurrence after stopping treatment: analysis of individual participants' data from seven trials.

Authors:  Florent Boutitie; Laurent Pinede; Sam Schulman; Giancarlo Agnelli; Gary Raskob; Jim Julian; Jack Hirsh; Clive Kearon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-05-24

9.  Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; John Pa Ioannidis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Serious Bacterial Infections Acquired During Treatment of Patients Given a Diagnosis of Chronic Lyme Disease - United States.

Authors:  Natalie S Marzec; Christina Nelson; Paul Ravi Waldron; Brian G Blackburn; Syed Hosain; Tara Greenhow; Gary M Green; Catherine Lomen-Hoerth; Marjorie Golden; Paul S Mead
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  Geriatric Choosing Wisely choice of recommendations in France: a pragmatic approach based on clinical audits.

Authors:  T Tannou; E Menand; D Veillard; J Berthou Contreras; C Slekovec; V Daucourt; D Somme; A Corvol
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.