Literature DB >> 28477038

[Response to and further development of the Choosing wisely initiative].

U R Fölsch1, M Hallek2, T Raupach3, G Hasenfuß3.   

Abstract

The Choosing wisely initiative of the German Society of Internal Medicine ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin," DGIM) and its 12 core focus area specialist societies were brought into being in 2014. The German initiative differs from the American campaign in that it not only considers overuse of diagnostic and therapeutic healthcare services, but also addresses procedures which are frequently not performed although they would bring benefits for patients. Furthermore, the recommendations were approved by an interdisciplinary consensus commission under consideration of all key internal medicine aspects. Since 2014, the initiative has received widespread attention. The 115 recommendations approved by the consensus commission have meanwhile been published in 20 articles. An array of measures were subsequently adopted to further promote the Choosing wisely recommendations ("Klug-entscheiden-Empfehlungen," KEE). These include the systematic incorporation of KEE symposia into DGIM annual congresses and the congresses of the core focus area specialist societies, as well as consideration of the KEE during establishment of future guidelines. Particular attention was paid to the importance of initiating and promoting a research project aimed at familiarizing medical students with the principles and content of the Choosing wisely initiative. The decision for or against specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures represents an essential medical competence, which should therefore be trained prior to qualification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery of health care; Guidelines as topic; Medical overuse; Recommendations; Underuse, health services

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477038     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-017-0246-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  8 in total

1.  Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services.

Authors:  Nancy E Morden; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ["Choosing wisely" - avoiding unnecessary medical procedures].

Authors:  M Hallek
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 0.628

3.  [Choosing wisely in internal medicine].

Authors:  G Hasenfuß; E Märker-Hermann; M Hallek; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  ["Choosing wisely" in infectious diseases : Overuse of antibiotics - too few vaccinations].

Authors:  N Jung; H Koop; R Riessen; J-C Galle; B Jany; E Märker-Hermann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  [Choosing wisely : Primarily the quality of indications].

Authors:  G Hasenfuß; E Märker-Hermann; M Hallek; C Sieber
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  [The Choosing Wisely Initiative of the German Society of Internal Medicine : Recommendations of the German Society for Endocrinology and the German Society for Geriatrics].

Authors:  J Feldkamp; M Schott; M Gogol; M Quinkler; M Blüher; S Diederich; M Reincke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  [Choosing wisely together with the patient].

Authors:  U R Fölsch; G Hasenfuß
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Wolfson; John Santa; Lorie Slass
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.