| Literature DB >> 27247703 |
Rafael Henrique Oliveira Lopes1, Luis Fernando Benitez Macorini1, Katia Ávila Antunes1, Priscilla Pereira de Toledo Espindola1, Tamaeh Monteiro Alfredo1, Paola Dos Santos da Rocha1, Zefa Valdivina Pereira1, Edson Lucas Dos Santos1, Kely de Picoli Souza1.
Abstract
High levels of reactive oxygen species in the body and hyperlipidemia are key factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. The present study investigated the antioxidant and hypolipidemic activity of hydroethanolic extract of Curatella americana L. leaves (ExC). The antioxidant activity of ExC was assessed by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical (DPPH) scavenging capacity and protection against hemolysis induced by 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH), followed by quantification of malondialdehyde (MDA). Wistar rats with hyperlipidemia induced by high-fructose diet (60%) were treated for 60 days with water, simvastatin (30 mg·Kg(-1)), ciprofibrate (2 mg·Kg(-1)), and ExC (200 mg·Kg(-1)). ExC revealed IC50 of 6.0 ± 0.5 μg·mL(-1), an intermediary value among positive controls used in the assay of DPPH scavenging capacity. At all concentrations (50 to 125 μg·mL(-1)) and times (60 to 240 min) evaluated, ExC protected erythrocytes against AAPH-induced hemolysis, which was confirmed by lower MDA levels. In vivo tests showed a reduction of 34 and 45%, respectively, in serum concentration of cholesterol and triglycerides in hyperlipidemic rats treated with ExC, a similar effect compared to the reference drugs, simvastatin and ciprofibrate, respectively. Together, the results showed the antioxidant activity of ExC and its ability to improve the serum lipid profile in hyperlipidemic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27247703 PMCID: PMC4876233 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9681425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
IC50 and maximum activity of DPPH free radical scavenging of standard antioxidants and the hydroethanolic extract of C. americana L. leaves (ExC).
| Treatment | IC50 ( |
| Maximum activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % |
| |||
| Ascorbic acid | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 2 | 92.3 ± 0.8 | 10 |
| BHT | 18.3 ± 4.5 | 2 | 93.7 ± 1.3 | 500 |
| ExC | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 3 | 96.5 ± 1.2 | 25 |
n = number of independent experiments in triplicate. BHT = butylhydroxytoluene.
Figure 1Hemolysis assessment at (a) 60, (b) 120, (c) 180, and (d) 240 min after addition of AAPH in erythrocytes at 2.5% (control) incubated with different concentrations (50–125 µg·mL−1) of ascorbic acid (AA) and hydroethanolic extract of C. americana L. leaves (ExC). P < 0.0001 versus control samples.
Figure 2Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration at 240 min after the addition of AAPH hemolysis inducer in 2.5% erythrocytes incubated with different concentrations (50–125 µg·mL−1) of ascorbic acid (AA) and hydroethanolic extract of C. americana L. leaves (ExC) compared with control samples. P < 0.001 versus control samples.
Serum lipid profile and hepatic and renal parameters of normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic Wistar rats induced by high-fructose diet (66%) treated with water (control), simvastatin (20 mg·kg−1 of body weight, simvastatin), ciprofibrate (2 mg·kg−1 of body weight, ciprofibrate), and hydroethanolic extract of C. americana L. leaves (ExC) (200 mg·kg−1 of body weight, ExC).
| Parameters | Normolipidemic | Hyperlipidemic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Simvastatin | Ciprofibrate | ExC | ||
| Total cholesterol (mg·dL−1) | 80.0 ± 2.0a | 118.3 ± 13.0b | 91.3 ± 5.2ab | 86.4 ± 4.3a | 77.9 ± 4.1a |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg·dL−1) | 45.0 ± 2.4a | 58.0 ± 4.4b | 54.0 ± 3.1a | 47.0 ± 2.4a | 46.0 ± 2.3a |
| Triglycerides (mg·dL−1) | 138.3 ± 23.0a | 225.0 ± 33.0b | 119.0 ± 7.0a | 155.0 ± 14.0ab | 136.9 ± 7.5a |
| AST (U·L−1) | 174.0 ± 6.5 | 178.0 ± 14.5 | 220.0 ± 20.1 | 209.0 ± 9.4 | 191.8 ± 12.3 |
| ALT (U·L−1) | 53.2 ± 3.3 | 65.4 ± 7.0 | 64.9 ± 5.6 | 65.0 ± 4.0 | 64.3 ± 9.3 |
| Urea (U·L−1) | 23.0 ± 2.0 | 30.0 ± 3.1 | 21.0 ± 1.4 | 26.0 ± 3.7 | 24.0 ± 3.8 |
| Creatinine (U·L−1) | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 |
Mean values followed by different superscript letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).